Skip to Main navigation Skip to Left navigation Skip to Main content Skip to Footer

University of Minnesota Extension
www.extension.umn.edu
612-624-1222
We're looking for your feedback on the Extension website. Please take our survey.

Extension > Environment > Agroforestry > Hybrid Poplar (Populus spp)

Print Icon Email Icon Share Icon
Print an info sheet

Hybrid Poplar (Populus spp)

Diomy Zamora and Gary Wyatt

Background

Due to its widespread geographic adaptation, rapid growth, ease of reproduction and coppicing ability, Populus species are ideal candidates for SRWCs. Populus is a widely researched tree genus and is the most studied genus among all SRWC taxa (Tuskan et al., 2006). Populus spp. and their hybrids (i.e., poplars) are a significant component of the total biofuels and bioenergy feedstock resource in the USA, Canada, and Europe. They are capable of producing in excess of ha-1 yr-1 by age six even in the harsh climate of the North Central region of the United States (Riemenschneider et al., 2001; Zalesny et al., 2009).

Biology and Production System

Bernie McMahon, Univeristy of Minnesota-Duluth

Fig 1. Two-year old hybrid poplar trees planted in a loam soil in central Minnesota, USA

There are 29 recognized Populus species worldwide, with 12 native to North America. They possess abundant genetic variation, occurring at the genus, sectional, species, and clonal levels (Berguson et al., 2010; Zalesny et al., 2011). Features that make them suitable for biomass production include their ease of rooting and vegetative propagation, quick establishment and fast growth, and ability to resprout following repeated harvesting (Fig1)

Cutting

Poplar plantation establishment uses unrooted, hardwood stem cuttings approximately 20-30 cm in length. The use of vegetative propagation allow for easy and inexpensive planting stem cuttings from dormant material. Once harvested, cuttings are stored under refrigeration, and then planted in the field when soil temperatures reach levels appropriate to specific regions and genotypes.

Spacing

Plant spacing of poplars can vary widely depending on the intended end product. In situations where debarked wood is required (e.g., paper, oriented strand board, potentially biochemical liquid fuels), lower plant populations ranging from 750 to 1700 stems ha-1 are used to produce large diameter trees which facilitate debarking, typically on a ten to twelve year rotation. However, plantations oriented toward repeated coppice production of woody biomass for energy applications may be planted at higher densities ranging from 5,000 to 10,000 stems ha-1 (Al Afas et al., 2008). Plantations require intensive weed management during the first one to three years, until canopy closure is reached

Management and Harvesting

Poplars can be managed in a number of ways, depending on the desired end product, management system, and target rotation age. More closely spaced systems have the potential advantage of reaching canopy closure more quickly and producing higher biomass yield. However, this advantage is partially offset by higher planting costs, thus affecting economics (Berguson et al., 2012). Populus fiber production systems are harvested every 7-15 years (Zalesny et al., 2011). Populus bioenergy plantations require shorter rotation periods, although more research on bioenergy rotation periods, as well as how yields from these compare to longer rotation periods, is needed.

The most important drivers of poplar SRWC system productivity include proper species or hybrid selection for site conditions, correct site preparation, pest/disease resistance (Hansen, 1994; Berguson et al., 2010; Zalesny et al., 2011,) and weed control at establishment (Hansen, 1994; Kauter et al., 2003). Typical operational procedures may include tillage, fertilization, and irrigation (Sartori et al., 2007). Thinning is sometimes conducted at higher planting densities to provide a supply of biomass at intermediate points in the rotation.

Bernard McMahon, Univeristy of Minnesota, Duluth

Fig 2. Twelve year old hybrid poplar plantation in a single-stem, single-harvest management system in Minnesota, US ready for harvest

Populus species are typically harvested after several years, with a rotation period of five years or less for bioenergy crops. Rotation lengths for poplar are expected to range from 3-5 years in coppice regeneration as opposed to 5-15 years in more traditional single-rotation, single-stem plantations (Hansen et al., 1994; Berguson et al., 2010, Zalesny et al., 2011) (Fig 2). The means through which trees resprout after harvest, or coppicing, varies with species. Sprouting characteristics affect ease of harvest and machinery requirements as species that are restricted to stump sprouting retain the original planted row orientation. The ability for many Populus species to resprout after harvests defrays the cost of replanting in successful plantations.

Breeding and Genetic Improvements

Genetic variation among both pure-species collections and hybrids is very high in Populus, which presents opportunities to improve biomass yield and nutrient efficiency. There are many possible breeding strategies that can be applied to the development of a hybrid poplar woody biomass crop (Riemenschneider et al., 2001). Yet, all breeding strategies derive from the need for a commercial variety to possess several attributes simultaneously such as an adventitious root system, rapid growth, and resistance to pests (US DOE, 2011). Elsewhere, interspecific hybridization may be necessary.

This need for an aggregate genotype possessing all required commercial attributes gives rise to the several breeding programs found throughout North America (Table 1) and elsewhere in the world.

Commercial genotypes have most, if not all, of the important traits affecting production. However, the number of commercial genotypes in use today is relatively low, and diversification, as well as yield improvement, is a goal of breeding programs (Berguson et al., 2010; US DOE, 2011; Zalesny et al., 2011). In the US, genetic improvement research varies considerable across the country (Table 2).

Biomass Production

Biomass production is one of the criteria of assessing feasibility of Populus clones for bioenergy and bioproducts application. The sprouting ability of these species is also necessary to understand yield potential. It is currently understood that over 20,000 stems ha-1 of Populus can resprout after first-year thinnings from a combination of stump and root sprouts depending on the species. Populus species have great potential for biomass production. Certain genotypes of the Eastern cottonwood (P. deltoides) and its hybrids, for example, are capable of producing yields ranging from 9 - 20 Mg ha-1 yr-1 in the US (Wright, 2006; Berguson et al., 2010; Zalesny et al., 2011, Zamora et al., 2013) and other parts of the world (Table 3) with a wide range of environmental conditions suitable for their production, which differs based on climate, soil properties, and cultural practices.

Table 1. Currently active Populus spp. breeding programs in North America.

Company Location Region of concentration Area Focus
Greenwood Resource Institute Boardman, Oregon, USA USA 9,300 ha
  • Operating on a 15-year rotation with the output going into the saw log market.
  • Signed an agreement with ZeaChem, a cellulosic ethanol company, to supply them with feedstock from their hybrid poplar farm.
  • Alberta-Pacific Forest Products Alberta, Canada Canada 8,000 ha
  • Growing hybrid poplar trees to feed pulp mills in Alberta, Canada and nearby regions.
  • Ensuring fiber supply availability in response to the deforestation activities in Alberta caused by Tar Sand development.
  • ArborGen USA, New Zealand, Australia and Brazil Worldwide
  • Largest global supplier of seedling products and a leading provider of improved technologies to the commercial forest industry
  • Developing high value products through conventional breeding and genetic improvement
  • Working to improve the sustainability of working forests while helping to meet the world's growing need for wood, fiber and energy.
  • University of Minnesota. Duluth-Natural Resources Research Institute USA USA
  • Working to increase yield and genetic diversity of poplar for use as an energy crop
  • Collecting data from clonal trials, yield tests, spacing trials, and large-scale genetics test with some locations containing over 900 genotypes.
  • Table 2. Genetic improvement of Populus spp in the United States based on geographical locations.

    Location Genetic improvement focus Authors
    Upper-Midwest DN34, DN5, and NM6 were found to be disease resistant and fast growing under a range of conditions. Large breeding program has produced new hybrid to increase growth rate, genetic diversity and disease resistance Hansen et al., 1994; Berguson et al.,2010
    Southern U.S. (Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley (LMAV) P. deltoides perform best on those sites that are high in nutrient availability and have consistent rainfall. Unlike pure P. deltoides, limited testing of hybrid poplars in the South has not determined the incidence of Septoria canker, a potentially serious disease of some poplars. Berguson et al., 2010
    Pacific Northwest Identify superior clones of P. trichocarpa and produce hybrids of P. deltoides and P. trichocarpa for commercial production Stanton et al., 2002

    Table 3. Biomass yield of Populus spp. across the globe.

    Country Varieties Rotation Biomass (Mg ha-1) Reference
    Ghent, Belgium Populus trichocarpa x deltoides-Hoogvorst annual 3.5 Vande Walle et al., 2007
    Nanjing, China P. deltoides Bartr. cv. 'Lux', P. euramericana (Dode) Guinier cv. `San Martino', P. deltoides Bartr. cv. `Havard' annual 10.3 Fang et al., 1999
    Jiangsu Province, China P. deltoides cv. "35" annual 8.8-15.2 Fang et al., 1999
    Bihar, India P. deltoides G3 intercropping system annual 12.1 Das and Chaturvedi, 2005
    Sweden P. balsamifera L., P. maximowiczii x P. trichocarpa, P. trichocarpa x P. deltoides, P. trichocarpa 4 years 141.9 Johansson and Karačić, 2011
    Quebec, Canada 2 clones of P. maximowiczii x P. nigra (NM5 and NM6) 4 years 66.5 Labrecque and Teodorescu, 2005
    Hungary P. trichocarpa x deltoides annual 16.3 Marosvőlgyi et al., 1999
    Scotland P. balsamifera var. Michauxii (Henry) x P. trichocarpa var. Hastata (Dode) Farwell annual 5.5 Proe et al., 1999
    US Iowa 7300501 5 years 16.8 Riemenschneider et al., 2001
    US Wisconsin 80X00601 5 years 8.5 Riemenschneider et al., 2001
    US Minnesota D121 5 years 6.8 Riemenschneider et al., 2001
    US Iowa Eugenii 7 years 17.0 Goerndt and Mize, 2008
    US Iowa Eugenii 7 years 5.4 Tufekcioglu et al., 2003
    US Iowa Cradon 10 years 30.0 Goerndt and Mize, 2008

    Contact

    Diomy Zamora at zamor015@umn.edu or 612-626-9272
    Gary Wyatt at wyatt@umn.edu or 507-389-6748

    • © Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
    • The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. Privacy