University of Minnesota Extension

WW-07637     2001  

Preparing an Odor Management Plan

David Schmidt, Extension Engineer
Larry Jacobson, Extension Engineer
Kevin Janni, Extension Engineer
Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering


Odor Planning


-

Copyright ©  2001  Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.


Introduction

Minnesota Rules Relating to Animal Feedlots and Storage, Transportation, and Utilization of Animal Manure, Chapter 7020.0505 Subpart 4 B, requires feedlots with 1,000 animal units or more to submit an air emission plan. This plan must include:

  • methods and practices that will be used to minimize air emissions resulting from animal feedlot or manure storage area operations including manure storage area start-up practices, loading, and manure removal;
  • measures to be used to mitigate air emission in the event of exceedance of the state ambient hydrogen sulfide standard; and
  • a complaint response protocol describing the procedures the owner will use to respond to complaints directed at the facility including a list of each potential odor source at the facility, a determination of the odor sources most likely to generate significant amounts of odors, and a list of anticipated odor control strategies for addressing each of the significant odor sources.

This air emissions plan must address odor specifically but may also include dust and specific gases such as hydrogen sulfide and ammonia. Although this air emission plan is only required for those sites over 1,000 animal units, all feedlots should consider writing such a plan. An odor management plan helps avoid nuisance odor conflicts and shows the intent to be a good neighbor. This publication presents information on preparing odor management plans for farms of any size.

Odor Management Plans

Manure management plans have become a standard practice for most animal production systems. These plans document the proper handling and application of manure onto cropland. Likewise, odor management plans systematically identify potential odor sources, determine control strategies to reduce these odors, and establish criteria for implementing these strategies.

The development of an odor management plan consists of the following four steps:

  • Create a list of the potential odor sources on the farm.
  • Determine which of the odor sources are the most likely to bring about odor complaints.
  • List one or two odor control strategies for each of the significant odor sources.
  • Develop a protocol to respond to odor complaints.

(A guide can be found below.)

Inventory of Odor Sources

Nuisance odors can be the result of a single odor source, a single odor event, or the combination of several sources and events. Therefore, it is important to conduct a thorough inventory of all odor sources on the farm. This inventory should be conducted on-site in a systematic way to ensure that all odor sources are included.

Odors from an animal production site originate from three primary sources: manure storage structures, animal housing (including open lots), and land application of manure. However, other sources such as dead animal disposal sites, silage piles, feed centers, and any other areas where organic matter is present may also contribute to odor emissions. These other odor sources are often overlooked in discussions about nuisance complaints. For instance, improperly managed dead animal disposal sites can generate significant amounts of odors. Intermittent odor events (e.g., manure agitation) should also be listed in the odor inventory because often these events, though infrequent, can be the source of significant odor emissions and thus generate odor complaints.

A brief description of each odor source should be included in the inventory. This description should include the size of the odor source (physical area) and its distance and direction from roadways, neighbors, property boundaries, etc. (See shaded box below.)

Descriptions of odor sources should include the following types of information:

Buildings
  • Size/dimensions
  • Number and size of animals
  • Distance to neighbors and public areas
  • Distance to property line
  • Ventilation system
  • Feeding system
  • Manure system (liquid, slurry, solid)
  • Topographical features
Manure storage
  • Type of storage
  • Type and number of animals contributing
  • Size/dimensions
  • Distance to neighbors and public areas
  • Distance to property line
Land application of manure
  • Type of application equipment (broadcast, knife inject, sweep inject, etc.)
  • Timing of manure applications
  • Location of manure applications and distance to neighbors
  • Agitation procedure
Table 1. Odor emission reference rate for animal and poultry housing*
Species Animal Type Housing Type Odor Emission Number
(Rate)
Cattle Beef Dirt/concrete lot, Free stall, scrape; 4
  Dairy Free stall, deep pit, Loose housing, scrape; 6
    Tie stall, scrape; 2
Swine Gestation Deep pit, natural or mechanical 50
    Pull plug, natural or mechanical 30
  Farrowing Pull plug, natural or mechanical 14
  Nursery Deep pit, natural or mechanical; Pull plug, natural or mechanical; 42
  Finishing Deep pit, natural or mechanical 34
    Pull plug, natural or mechanical 20
    Hoop bar, deep bedded, scrape; Cargill (open front), scrape; 4
    Loose housing, scrape; Open concrete lot, scrape; 11
Poultry Broiler Litter 1
  Turkey Litter 2

*Taken from Livestock and Poultry Odor Workshop Manual II, Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, University of Minnesota, 2000

Table 2. Odor emission reference rate for manure storage*
Storage Type Odor Emission Number
(Rate)
Earthen basin, single or multiple cells 13
Steel or concrete tank, above or below ground 28
Crusted stockpile 2

Earthen basins are designed for manure storage only. A properly designed treatment lagoon may have far less odor.
*Taken from Livestock and Poultry Odor Workshop Manual II, Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, University of Minnesota, 2000

Determination of High Odor Sources

A good odor management plan must also identify which of the many on-farm odor sources have the highest potential to create nuisance odors.

Research has shown that some odor sources emit more odor per unit area than other sources (Tables 1 and 2). Therefore, both relative odor emissions and the size of the odor source must be considered in determining the high odor sources. Intermittent sources, such as liquid manure agitation and pumping or land application, also cause relatively high odor emissions and should be considered in the development of a list of high odor sources.

Another factor to consider in determining high odor sources is the proximity of the sources to public areas or neighbors. Dilution of odors is caused through the mixing of odors with ambient air. This dilution of odorous air is a function of distance, topography, and meteorological conditions. Farther distances between odor sources and the public will result in fewer nuisance complaints. Topographical features can either enhance dilution or reduce dilution depending on the particular feature. Wind breaks or tree lines will encourage mixing of the odorous air with clean air, whereas valleys or low areas may reduce odor dilution. Meteorological conditions also affect dilution. Maximum dilution occurs when the cool air near the ground is heating and rising. Conversely, during the late evenings when it is calm and the atmosphere is cooling, the odorous air is trapped near the ground and there is little dilution. Of these three factorsÑdistance, topography, and meteorologyÑseparation distance will likely have the biggest impact on nuisance complaints.

Possible Odor Control Technologies

BioFilter

Figure 1. Biofilter on exhaust fans for odor control.

Manure lagoon

Figure 2. Manure storage cover for odor control.


Odor control technologies can be thought of in three different categoriesÑthose that reduce the generation of odors, those that decrease the emission of odors, and those that increase dilution of odors. Several of these technologies are listed in Table 3. (See also the shaded box) Since there is little known about many of these technologies, the odor management plan should list one, two, or possibly three control technologies for each of the high odor sources. If the first odor control strategy proves ineffective, then the second or third strategy can be implemented.

Reduce Odor Generation

Control technologies that reduce the production or generation of odorous gases include: manure treatment technologies such as anaerobic digesters or aeration systems, diet manipulation to reduce the amount of manure produced or the amount of nutrients in the manure, or chemical or biological additives. Manure treatment technologies can be very effective at odor control but are typically expensive. Chemical additions can also be effective, and the cost depends on the specific chemical and the frequency of addition. Biological additives are typically less expensive than manure treatment or chemical additives, but their effectiveness often varies by farm site and particular additive.

Reduce Odor Emissions

Technologies considered to reduce emissions are those that capture and treat the odorous gases before they leave the site. In most situations these gases are converted through biological, physical, or chemical processes to other non-odorous gases. Biofilters are a good example of a technology that reduces odor emissions. A biofilter treats the odorous gases as they are emitted from an odor source. Microorganisms in the biofilter media oxidize these complex odorous chemicals into simple odorless compounds. The air emitted from the biofilter is nearly odor free.

Increase Odor Dispersion

Technologies that disperse and dilute odors include shelterbelts, windbreak walls, and setback distances. Of these, setback distances are the most effective. New information on shelterbelts suggests that some odor reduction occurs because of the increased turbulence caused by the windbreak and because of some capturing of the odorous gases on the tree foliage.


Go To: Page 2


College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences and University of Minnesota Extension Logos

-

Produced by Communication and Educational Technology Services, University of Minnesota Extension.

In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, this material is available in alternative formats upon request. Please contact your University of Minnesota Extension office or the Extension Store at (800) 876-8636.


▲ Back to top