A Very, Very Select Listof Recent Socialization References(with emphasis on the physical punishment debate)Ronald L. Pitzer
Baumrind, Diana. The discipline controversy revisited. Family Relations 45(4): 405-414 October 1996 Baumrind, Diana. A blanket injunction against disciplinary use of spanking is not warranted by the data. Pediatrics 98(4):828-831 Oct 1996 Baumrind, Diana. Necessary distinctions. Psychological Inquiry 8(3):176-182 Larzelere, Robert. Implications of the strongest studies for discriminating effective vs counterproductive corporal punishment. Pediatrics 98(4): 824-828 Oct 1996 Straus, Murray A. Beating the Devil Out of Them: Corporal Punishment in American Families. Lexington Books. 1994 Straus, Murray A. Spanking and the making of a violent society. Pediatrics 98(4):837-842 Oct 1996 Straus, Murray A., David B. Sugarman, & Jean Giles-Sims. Spanking by parents and subsequent antisocial behavior of children. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 151:761-767 August 1997 Damon, William. (ed) Handbook of Child Psychology. Wiley. 1997 (Four volumes, 3000+ pp. $500) Grusec, Joan & Leon Kuczynski (eds). Parenting and Children's Internalization of Values: A Handbook of Contemporary Theory. Wiley. 1997 A number of other reports and reviews of research on the physical punishment of children are included in Pediatrics 98(4) Oct 1996 For a comprehensive (some 600 citations, some 60 pages), bibliography on socialization practices, visit Parental Socialization Practices: A Research Bibliography. R. Pitzer Back to Table of Contents
Agriculture \
Community \
Environment \
Family \
Garden \
Youth
Home \ Search \ News \ Workshops \ Online Shopping About Extension \ Extension Offices In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, this material is available in alternative formats upon request. Please contact your University of Minnesota Extension office or the Extension Store at (800) 876-8636. University of Minnesota Extension is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, disability, public assistance status, veteran status, or sexual orientation. |