WW-06514-GO Reviewed 2008
Copyright © 2002 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
Overapplication of nitrogen (N) to corn is causing much concern due to the environmental consequences associated with unused N. There is also a significant economic advantage in applying the correct rate of N fertilizer. Excess, unused N can be lost from the soil system via denitrification and/or leaching, be tied up in the soil organic N pool, or stay in the crop's rooting zone as residual N.
Recent research has indicated that measuring residual, available N through a soil test can refine current N recommendations for corn. This soil N test involves collecting 0-2 ft. soil samples in the spring before planting and having the samples analyzed for nitrate-N. The quantity of nitrate-N found is then used to calculate a residual N credit.
Soil N testing has been a management tool for western Minnesota (see Figure 1) for a number of years. It is recommended that a late fall or spring preplant N soil test be taken and the measured amount of nitrate-N be subtracted according to the formula in Equation 1.
|NRec = (1.2)(YG)-STN(0-24in.)-NPC
NRec = amount of fertilizer N needed, lb./acre
YG = realistic yield goal, bu./acre
STN(0-24 in.) = amount of nitrate-nitrogen
(NO3 - N) measured by using the soil nitrate test, lb./acre
NPC = Nitrogen credits, if any, for previous crops in the rotation, lb./acre
Nitrogen recommendations for corn have been made using a much different approach in the remainder of the state. The approach used in western Minnesota is not appropriate for eastern and central Minnesota due to higher rainfall. In these regions, where higher rainfall amounts occur, N recommendations are made using Table 1, which accounts for organic matter levels, previous crop, and expected yield.
Figure 1. Map of Minnesota indicating area of western
Minnesota currently using a soil nitrate test (shaded
area) and counties where new soil N test research was
Table 1. Nitrogen recommendations for corn for situations where the soil nitrate test is not used.
|Yield Goal (bu./acre)|
| N to apply (lb./acre) |
(4 + plants/ft2),
|medium and high||0||0||0||0||0||20||40|
(1 or less plants/ft2)
|medium and high||0||30||60||80||110||130||150|
|medium and high||20||50||80||100||130||150||170|
|Group 1 crops||low||0||15||45||75||105||125||145|
|Group 2 crops||low||60||90||120||150||180||200||220|
|* Low = less than 3.0% medium and high = 3.0% or more. The well-drained silt loam soils in southeastern Minnesota receive the N recommendations listed for soils with a medium and high organic matter level. All irrigated soils are included in the medium and high organic matter category.|
** Use these credits for small grains only if stubble is tilled after harvest. If there was no tillage, use recommendations for crops in Group 2.
*** These recommendations should be increased by 20 lb N/acre to compensate for less N credit on coarse-textured soils
|CROPS IN GROUP 1||CROPS IN GROUP 2|
|alfalfa (2-3 plants/ft2)||buckwheat||grass pasture||sorghum-sudan|
|grass/legume hay||flax||potatoes||sweet corn|
|grass/legume pasture||grass hay||vegetables|
The raised interest in economic and environmental concerns in the 1980s led to a revisiting of the concept of including a soil N test to refine fertilizer N recommendations for corn in the humid regions in Minnesota. A major research study conducted from 1989 through 1992 provided the data from 59 sites in 19 counties (see Figure 1) that has led to the development of a new soil N test throughout Minnesota.
This research was conducted on a variety of soil types, primarily on farmers' fields. A host of sampling depths, times, and analysis parameters were evaluated in countless combinations. Grain yield response to N was best indicated by soil nitrate-N measured from a two-foot sampling depth. The direct correlation between yield response to N and soil N test was not as strong as desired, but subsequent calculations led to a strong correlation between soil nitrate-N at preplant time and "unaccounted N" using the traditional, non-soil test recommendations. The "unaccounted N" was deemed to be residual N. This relationship can be seen for one set of data in Figure 2, which is the basis for the residual N credit in Figure 3.
Figure 2. Linear relationship between 0-2 ft. nitrate-N concentrations
measured before planting and residual N credit for a subset of dataset.
Figure 3. Soil N credit amounts as a delineated, adjusted function of
the preplant nitrate-N concentrations. At 19 ppm or greater nitrate-N, no
fertilizer N would be recommended.
Although the western tier of Minnesota has an existing process for including soil N test information into corn N recommendations, the new procedure described in this bulletin can also be used in western Minnesota. Slight differences in N recommendations may appear in comparing the two procedures for a given site due to mathematical rounding differences inherent in each procedure.
Evaluation of N recommendations made with and without the preplant soil N test in this research project identified some conditions where the new 0-2 ft. preplant soil nitrate-N test has the greatest utility and impact. The user should first evaluate whether conditions exist for residual N to accumulate. Factors such as previous crop, soil texture, and preceding rainfall have significant effects on accumulation of residual N.
A crop rotation that has corn following corn generally provides the greatest potential for significant residual N accumulation. This is probably due to the amount of fertilizer N added to the previous corn crop, the fact that corn doesn't scavenge excess N from the soilin contrast to a legumeand manure additions are frequently made to continuous corn fields. In contrast, when soybean is the previous crop, much less residual N has been measured, as soybeans will use residual N in the soil in addition to the N that it symbiotically fixes within its nodules.
The new soil N test works best on medium- and fine-textured soils derived from loess or glacial till. The use of the proposed soil N test on coarse-textured soils derived from glacial outwash does not appear to be promising. Outwash sites consistently had low soil N test values in the study and one would not expect to measure significant residual N in these sandy soils.
The amount of residual N in the soil is also dependent on the rainfall received the previous year. In a year following a widespread drought, 1989 for example, a majority of fields will have significant residual N. However, following relatively wet years, such as the early 1990s, little residual N can be expected.
Previous manure applications to a field generally result in increased residual N in the soil. While it is perceived that the most recent manure applications (year of or year after application) would best be reflected by the soil N test, research experience indicates that the residual effects2, 3, or 4 years after applicationare best quantified by this new test.
In summary, the new soil N testing option, which accounts for residual N, will not be appropriate for all fields and conditions. Figure 4 can be used to help decide which fields may need to be tested for residual nitrate-N. This flowchart uses such factors as previous crop, manure history, and a knowledge of previous rainfall.
Figure 4. Flow chart decision-aid for determining the probability of
having significant residual N in the soil.
Nitrogen fertilizer recommendations for corn can be made with or without the new soil N test. Because the soil N test is used to estimate residual, available N, the University of Minnesota's previous N recommendations, which assume minimal residual N, are still the starting point for all recommendations. A five-step process is suggested for making corn N recommendations when the soil N test is considered.
This soil N test should not be used when commercial fertilizer was applied in the previous fall. The variability in the degree of N conversion to nitrate-N before the spring make this test meaningless in these situations.
When a soil N test is not used, manure N should be credited by calculating the amount of N that will be available (manure rate x manure N content x N availability) and subtracting this amount from the N recommendation determined based on yield, organic matter and previous crop.
Manure additions to soil can significantly increase soil nitrate-N concentrations; however, the amount of nitrate-N at any given time (i.e. spring preplant) is a function of the time of manure application and method of application. The following scenarios may help you understand how to most effectively use the new soil N test in combination with manure management to determine N recommendations.
If manure is to be applied in the spring before corn planting, collect the soil samples for N measurement before manure application. Determine the N recommendation and then separately calculate the manure N credit and subtract this amount from the previous N recommendation derived from the use of the soil N test.
If manure was applied during the winter months, it is assumed that the majority of the inorganic N would be lost via volatilization. Thus, the soil N test can be used to determine an N recommendation. However, the manure N credit (although less than from spring-applied manure) should be subtracted from this amount. Keep in mind that the spring sampling can occur anytime after the frost is out of the ground.
If manure was applied between October 1 and December 1 the previous fall, both the soil N test and the manure N worksheet credit system cannot be used. Not taking a soil N test, and just using the standard manure N crediting system, may result in high fertilizer recommendations if significant residual N was present before the manure was applied. In contrast, using only the spring soil N test to credit fall-applied manure will underestimate the credit due to the manure because all of the available manure N will not have converted to nitrate-N by this time. It is recommended that where manure had been applied in this time frame and the previous crop was soybeans, the N recommendation should be made based on the standard manure crediting system. However, if corn was the previous crop, the N recommendation should be based on the soil N test, knowing that the soil test may underestimate the available N coming from the manure.
If manure was applied before October 1 the previous fall, the soil N test will probably pick up most of the N from manure that will be available during the growing season. The amount of N released from manure's organic N fraction after taking the preplant sample will be minor compared to the accuracy of the N recommendation provided by the soil testing option.
The test does an excellent job of accounting for residual N where manure had been applied eleven months or more before the preplant soil N test samples are collected. This test should work particularly well in those situations with a long history of manure applications.
The preplant, 0-2-ft soil nitrate-N test can be used to provide a soil N credit that will improve N recommendations for corn. Current University of Minnesota N guidelines provide the initial N recommendation. The soil nitrate test will then be used to determine how much, if any, soil N credit should be subtracted from the initial recommendation.
A soil N test to estimate available residual N is not necessary for all acres to be planted to corn in Minnesota. Factors such as previous crop, soil texture, manure history, and previous rainfall should be used to determine which fields are most likely to benefit from the N test.
A five-step process is used to determine N recommendations.
M.A. Schmitt and G.W. Rehm are Extension Soil Scientists with the Department of Soil, Water and Climate in St. Paul. G.W.Randall is a Soil Scientist at the Southern Experiment Station in Waseca.
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, this material is available in alternative formats upon request. Please contact your University of Minnesota Extension office or the Extension Store at (800) 876-8636.