Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use
in East-Central and Central Minnesota
M.A. Schmitt and G.W. Randall
Copyright ©
2002 Regents of the University of
Minnesota. All rights reserved.
NOTE: At this time, figure labels and cutlines
indicate location of photos, graphics and tables available only in
publication form. Click here
for ordering information.
Nitrogen (N) is an essential plant nutrient that contributes greatly
to the agricultural economy of Minnesota crop producers.
Unfortunately, the nitrate form of nitrogen can leach into surface-
and groundwaters if nitrogen management is not practiced carefully.
The public will not tolerate contamination of water resources by
agricultural production systems; laws regulating use of nitrogen
fertilizers could be adopted if contamination from agricultural
activities is not minimized.
The research-based Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in this
bulletin are economically and environmentally sound. It is strongly
suggested that farmers adopt them voluntarily. By following these
recommendations, agriculture can avoid the threat of fertilizer
regulations and enjoy a more profitable and better community.
Introduction
Nitrogen (N) is an essential plant nutrient that is applied to
Minnesota crops in greater quantity than any other fertilizer. In
addition, vast quantities of nitrogen are contained in the ecosystem,
including in soil organic matter. Biological processes that convert
nitrogen to its mobile form, nitrate (NO3), occur
continuously in the soil system. (For greater detail see
Understanding Nitrogen in Soils FO-3770.) Unfortunately, nitrates
can be leached from the rooting part of the soil. To minimize losses
to surface- and groundwater, management guidelines have been
developed.
Best Management Practices (BMPs) for nitrogen are
broadly defined as "economically sound, voluntary practices that are
capable of minimizing nutrient contamination of surface- and
groundwater." The BMPs recommended here are based upon research,
particularly at the University of Minnesota and other land-grant
universities, and upon practical considerations.
The BMPs are based, in part, upon the concept of total nitrogen
management, which accounts for all forms of on-farm nitrogen in the
development of crop management plans. BMPs were developed to be
adopted on a statewide as well as a regional basis. Those developed
for east-central and central Minnesota refine the recommendations of
the statewide BMPs.
Statewide Nitrogen BMPs
Statewide BMPs are applicable to all crops and farming practices. They
are based upon the concept that accurate determination of crop
nitrogen needs is essential for profitable and environmentally sound
nitrogen management decisions. The statewide BMPs shown below are
described in greater detail in Best Management Practices for
Nitrogen Use Statewide in Minnesota FO-6125.
-
Set realistic yield goals.
-
Develop and use a comprehensive record-keeping system for
field-specific information.
-
Adjust nitrogen rate according to soil organic matter content,
previous crop and manure applications.
-
Use a soil nitrate test where appropriate.
-
Use prudent manure management to optimize nitrogen credit.
-
Test manure for nutrient content.
-
Calibrate manure application equipment.
-
Apply manure uniformly throughout a field.
-
Injection of manure is preferable, especially on strongly
sloping soils.
-
Avoid manure application to sloping, frozen soils.
-
Incorporate broadcast applications whenever possible.
-
Credit second-year nitrogen contributions from alfalfa and manure.
-
Do not apply nitrogen above recommended rates.
-
Plan nitrogen application timing to achieve high efficiency of
nitrogen use.
BMPs for East-Central and Central Minnesota
East-central and central Minnesota are characterized by coarse- to
medium-textured soils. Most soils in the region were formed in glacial
till, with some outwash plains also common. Most east-central and
central Minnesota soils are moderately to excessively drained. While
most soils in this region are susceptible to leaching, relative
differences must be assessed based on soil texture, rainfall, and
subsoil.
Average annual precipitation in the region is 25 to 30 inches. Crops
are dominated by corn and forages. Specific BMPs for these regions,
which include the counties of Cook, Lake, St. Louis, Carlton, Aitkin,
Itasca, Isanti, Koochiching, Lake of the Woods, Cass, Beltrami,
Hubbard, Wadena, Crow Wing, Morrison, Benton, Stearns, Todd, Mille
Lacs, Becker, Otter Tail, Kanabec, Pine, Chisago, Anoka, Sherburne,
Ramsey, Hennepin, Wright, and Washington (Figure 1),
have been based on field research in Minnesota as well as field
research conducted on similar soils in the Midwest.
Figure 1. Thirty-county area of east-central and central
Minnesota for specific BMPs for nitrogen.
Nitrogen BMPs for east-central and central Minnesota include:
Carefully manage nitrogen applications on soils characterized
by a high leaching potential.
1. Do not apply fertilizer nitrogen in the fall to coarse-textured
(sandy) soils.
Coarse-textured soils are present in counties throughout east-central
and central Minnesota. (For irrigated coarse-textured soils, refer to
the bulletin Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use on
Irrigated and Coarse-Textured Soils FO-6131.) It is extremely
important to practice high-level management of nitrogen on these soils
for environmental and agronomic reasons. Fall-applied nitrogen,
because of the delay between application and crop need, has a greater
risk of nitrifying and leaching out of the rooting zone.
Figure 2 illustrates the differential yield response
that time of nitrogen application produced when 78 pounds of nitrogen
per acre (lb N/A), as urea, was applied to non-irrigated,
coarse-textured soil.
Figure 2. Three-year corn grain average yields as affected by
fall, spring and early summer nitrogen applications. (Schmitt and
Beck, 1991)
2. When soils have a high leaching potential, application of nitrogen
in a sidedress or split application program is preferred. Use a
nitrification inhibitor with early sidedressed nitrogen on labeled
crops.
Data obtained in a three-year study on a coarse-textured, irrigated
soil at Becker indicate a clear advantage for sidedress and split
applications of nitrogen compared to a single preplant application
(Table 1). Under these conditions, corn yields were
increased by adding a nitrification inhibitor (nitrapyrin) to the
sidedress and split applications of nitrogen at rates up through 150
lb N/A.
Table 1. Three-year average corn grain yields as
influenced by time of application and N-Serve at Becker,
Minn. (Malzer et al., 1981-1983).
Nitrogen Treatment
Application Time
|
Inhibitor
|
Rate (lb N/A)
|
|
0
|
75
|
150
|
225
|
|
Yields (bu/A)
|
|
Preplant
|
None
|
82
|
124
|
147
|
158
|
|
Preplant
|
N-Serve
|
|
132
|
167
|
180
|
|
8-Leaf
|
None
|
|
147
|
179
|
193
|
|
8-Leaf
|
N-Serve
|
|
158
|
186
|
191
|
|
2/3 PP+1/3 12-L
|
None
|
|
132
|
159
|
191
|
|
2/3 PP+1/3 12-L
|
N-Serve
|
|
144
|
180
|
191
|
Spring preplant application of anhydrous ammonia or urea is
encouraged. Broadcast urea should be incorporated within three days of
application.
With soils that do not have a high leaching potential, using preplant
nitrogen fertilizer in the ammonium-N form instead of nitrate-N
(mobile) form reduces the immediate potential for nitrogen leaching
loss. Under normal spring conditions, anhydrous ammonia and urea will
take from two to six weeks to nitrify from the ammonium form to
nitrate. This delay decreases the potential for leaching of nitrate
during the last part of April and in May, when precipitation is
highest and crop demand for nitrogen and water is very low.
Urea broadcast on the surface should be mixed into the soil
(incorporated) soon after application to reduce potential loss by
volatilization and surface runoff. Volatilization is generally
accelerated by crop residue and high soil pH. Although high soil pH is
uncommon in east-central and central Minnesota, high amounts of
surface residue are more common because of conservation tillage being
used with continuous corn. In addition, urea left on the soil surface
can easily be washed toward streams and lakes during intense rains.
Inject or incorporate sidedress applications of urea and UAN to
a minimum depth of 4 inches.
Incorporation of urea and urea-containing fertilizers reduces the
potential for loss by volatilization. In addition, materials injected
or incorporated to a 4-inch depth are more likely to reach roots under
dry conditions. Surface-applied materials are less likely to reach
roots under dry conditions, and yields may suffer.
Nitrogen not absorbed by plants often remains in the soil after
harvest and thus is highly susceptible to leaching loss before the
next year's crop can use it.
Related Publications
FO-6125 Best Management
Practices for Nitrogen Use Statewide in Minnesota
FO-6126 Best Management
Practices for Nitrogen Use in Southeastern Minnesota
FO-6127 Best Management
Practices for Nitrogen Use in South-Central Minnesota
FO-6128 Best Management
Practices for Nitrogen Use in Southwestern and West-Central Minnesota
FO-6130 Best Management
Practices for Nitrogen Use in Northwestern Minnesota
FO-6131 Best Management
Practices for Nitrogen Use on Irrigated, Coarse-Textured Soils
FO-5883 Self-Assessment
Worksheets for Manure Management Plans
FO-3790 Fertilizing Corn in
Minnesota
FO-3813 Fertilizing
Soybeans in Minnesota
FO-3814 Fertilizing Alfalfa
in Minnesota
FO-3773 Fertilizing Barley
in Minnesota
FO-3772 Fertilizing Wheat
in Minnesota
FO-3770 Understanding
Nitrogen in Soils
FO-3774 Nitrification
Inhibitors and Use in Minnesota
FO-3769 Providing Proper N
Credit for Legumes
FO-2392 Managing Nitrogen
for Corn Production on Irrigated Sandy Soils
FO-0636 Fertilizer Urea
FO-3073 Using Anhydrous
Ammonia in Minnesota
FO-6074 Fertilizer
Management for Corn Planted in Ridge-till or No-till Systems
FO-3553 Manure Management
in Minnesota
M. A. Schmitt
Extension Specialist
Department of Soil, Water and Climate
University of Minnesota
G. W. Randall
Soil Scientist
Southern Experiment Station
University of Minnesota
Funding for this publication was by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Extension Service, under project number
91-EWQI-1-9265.
COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Produced by Communication and Educational Technology Services, University of
Minnesota Extension.
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, this material is available in alternative formats upon request. Please contact your University of Minnesota Extension office or the Extension Store at (800) 876-8636.
University of Minnesota Extension is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, disability, public assistance status, veteran status, or sexual orientation.
|