WW-05969-GO     Revised 1996  

Quick Guide to European Corn Borer Management: Scouting and Decision-Making for First Generation

Ken Ostlie

Copyright ©  2002  Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

The European corn borer causes more crop loss than any other corn insect in Minnesota. Economic infestations of first-generation larvae can be quickly identified and profitably controlled using this quick guide to scouting and insecticide decisions.

Scouting Instructions

1. Target earlier-planted, taller fields for scouting.
2. Visit each field every three to five days after moth flight begins. Check for moths in grassy field borders or contact your county extension office about flight status.
3. Sample five locations per 40 acres on each visit.
4. At each location, examine 20 plants for leaf feeding (or shotholing). See Figure 1 for example of shotholing. Record data on form at right.
5. Dissect two or more plants with leaf feeding at each location and count the number of borers. Record this number and larval stage(s). Count only borers not tunneling in stalk or midrib.
6. After completing samples, estimate borers per plant using the following formula:

   Borers/plant = (proportion of plants shotholed)
   X (borers/shotholed plant).

7. Using local control costs and projected crop value for field, look up the economic threshold (= break-even density of borers) in the table on the back of this page.
   Multiply by the desired economic return, e.g., 1.5 for 150% return on control costs, to calculate an action threshold.
8. Compare estimated borer density with the action threshold you just calculated.
9. If borer density exceeds threshold, quickly make arrangements to treat. Sketch diagram of field for applicator and indicate surrounding crops, homesteads, field entrances, power/telephone lines, and bee yards. Select insecticides from BU-0500, Insecticide Suggestions for Insect Pests of Minnesota Field Crops.
10. If not, resample in three to five days provided:
    • moth flight is still under way;
    • larvae are young (less than 3rd stage); and
    • tunneling is not prevalent.

FIELD DATA FORM

Date _______ Field ID_______ Acres_______ Co.________ Twnshp._______ Sec._________ Crop Value ________ Control Costs_______
Sample	# Shotholed   /20 plants	Borers per    shotholed        plant	Borer  Stage(s)
1	_______	_______	_______
2	_______	_______	_______
3	_______	_______	_______
4	_______	_______	_______
5	_______	_______	_______
6	_______	_______	_______
7	_______	_______	_______
8	_______	_______	_______
9	_______	_______	_______
10	_______	_______	_______
	=======	=======	=======
Total	_______	_______
No. plants	_______	_______
Avg	_______	_______

Estimated larvae/plant =
(proportion plants shotholed) X (borers/shotholed plant)
   = _______ X _______ = _______

Action threshold
   = economic threshold X return
   =_______ X _______ = _______

Decision: ___ Treat ___ Donât Treat ___ Resample

For a more complete discussion of European corn borer, see BU-2322 European Corn Borer Development and Management, and FO-5970 Managing First-Generation European Corn Borer.

Figure 1. Leaf injury (shotholing) caused by young corn borer

Figure 2. Where to look for young corn borers and leaf injury

Economic Thresholds ¹ (Borers/plant) for
First-Generation European Corn Borer
Crop Value ² ($/Acre)

Control Costs3 ($/Acre)
		200  250  300  350  400   450  500   550  600
	6	0.75	0.60	0.50	0.43	0.38	0.34	0.30	0.27	0.25
	7	0.88	0.70	0.58	0.50	0.44	0.39	0.35	0.32	0.29
	8	1.00	0.80	0.67	0.57	0.50	0.45	0.40	0.37	0.34
	9	1.12	0.90	0.75	0.64	0.56	0.50	0.45	0.41	0.38
	10	1.25	1.00	0.83	0.71	0.63	0.56	0.50	0.46	0.42
	11	1.38	1.10	0.92	0.79	0.69	0.61	0.55	0.50	0.46
	12	1.50	1.20	1.00	0.86	0.75	0.67	0.60	0.55	0.50
	13	1.63	1.30	1.08	0.93	0.81	0.72	0.65	0.59	0.54
	14	1.75	1.40	1.17	1.00	0.88	0.78	0.70	0.64	0.59
	15	1.88	1.50	1.25	1.07	0.94	0.84	0.75	0.68	0.63
	16	2.00	1.60	1.33	1.14	1.00	0.89	0.80	0.73	0.68
	17	2.13	1.70	1.42	1.21	1.06	0.95	0.85	0.78	0.71
	18	2.25	1.80	1.50	1.29	1.13	1.00	0.90	0.82	0.75

¹ Calculation makes four assumptions:

1. scouting is 100% efficient,
2. each scouted larva will produce one tunnel (=100% survival),
3. each tunnel will cause 5% yield loss, and
4. an insecticide application will control 80% of the larvae.

²Crop value = expected yield (bu/acre) X projected price ($/bu)

³Control costs = insecticide price ($/acre) + application costs ($/acre)

COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Produced by Communication and Educational Technology Services, University of Minnesota Extension.

In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, this material is available in alternative formats upon request. Please contact your University of Minnesota Extension office or the Extension Store at (800) 876-8636.