University of Minnesota Extension

M1195     2008  

title graphic: Ag Business Management

Cropland Rental Rates for Minnesota Counties

Gary Hachfeld, Extension Educator, Regional Center Mankato
William Lazarus, University of Minnesota Extension Economist, Farm Management
Dale Nordquist, Rann Loppnow, and Matt Heers, Center for Farm Financial Management


[printer-friendly pdf version]

Introduction

Land rental rates continue to be of interest to landowners and operators. Given the recent volatility in land rents, it is difficult to determine what rents may or should be. This publication provides some historical perspective on rental rates actually paid by a group of farms and trends over the past five years. This information is meant as a guide and starting point. The information and data is not meant to establish, determine, set, fix, or even hint at what actual rents should be. It is simply a reporting of historical land rental rates in Minnesota.

Historical rental data is included for years 2004 through 2008. Average rental rates are listed by county for each year. The 2008 data also includes the median cash rent and the 10 and 90 percentile range.

Because land rental rates have been so volatile recently, there is really no way to statistically project future rental rates. In the 2008 data, average rents increased substantially in most regions of the state. However, rents for this group of farms actually declined in the East Central region (41 farms total) as well as Morrison and Otter Tail counties. The 2009 and 2010 columns are included for you to list your actual 2009 rent and to list your anticipated 2010 rent.

Data Source

The land rental data shown in the data tables is extracted from FINBIN, a database of farm record summaries of over 2,400 Minnesota farms. The farmers participate in the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities (MnSCU) Farm Business Management program as well the Southwestern Minnesota Farm Business Management Association. The rental rates reported are their actual rents paid for the years listed.

Analysis Method

Staff from the Center for Farm Financial Management used FINBIN data to compile the rent database for the years 2004 through 2008.

All row crop acres, small grain acres, canning crop acres, etc. are included in the data analysis. Not included in the analysis are acres allocated to pasture, aftermath grazing, all hay and haylage acres, CRP acres, fallow, and prevented planted acres. All normal farming practices for the regions were included in the analysis.

Data was analyzed by county. Counties with a minimum of 15 farms reporting land rent data are included in the analysis. If a given county does not appear in the data table, there were not enough farms reporting data.

Data Results

The following two pages show the county data arranged in seven regions consistent with the Minnesota Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Statistics Service districts.

Due to insufficient data, the following counties are not included in the survey information:
Aitkin, Anoka, Becker, Beltrami, Carlton, Cass, Chisago, Clearwater, Cook, Crow Wing, Hennepin, Houston, Hubbard, Isanti, Itasca, Kittson, Koochiching, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Meeker, Mille Lacs, Pennington, Pine, Ramsey, Rock, Roseau, Sherburne, St. Louis, Traverse, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, and Yellow Medicine counties.

Minnesota Cropland Rental Rates Per Acre

 

Average

2008

Estimate

 

2004

2005

2006

2007


Average

  Median

10th %ile

90th
%ile

2009

2010

Northwest

Clay

70

74

78

79

83

82

63

105

____

____

Mahnomen

52

53

56

56

59

45

24

60

____

____

Marshall

36

36

41

43

45

45

24

60

____

____

Norman

61

62

67

69

73

74

61

84

____

____

Polk

50

52

56

58

62

64

42

90

____

____

Red Wing

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

38

33

18

51

____

____

West Central

Big Stone

64

68

71

78

81

76

55

109

____

____

Chippewa

96

100

104

108

125

108

84

142

____

____

Douglas

60

63

65

n/a

76

66

33

90

____

____

Grant

78

81

88

90

102

93

60

130

____

____

Lac qui Parle

71

79

87

92

97

99

69

125

____

____

Otter Tail

42

41

44

65

60

45

17

84

____

____

Stevens

75

79

80

85

90

85

60

120

____

____

Swift

75

76

81

84

98

89

68

118

____

____

Wilkin

67

63

71

77

87

85

60

111

____

____

Central

Benton

43

n/a

n/a

n/a

39

39

15

86

____

____

Carver

104

n/a

n/a

n/a

131

129

84

158

____

____

Kandiyohi

96

102

n/a

n/a

126

116

69

148

____

____

McLeod

96

104

106

124

135

131

83

167

____

____

Morrison

31

38

38

44

43

35

18

62

____

____

Renville

104

106

122

121

152

154

86

200

____

____

Scott

112

119

120

109

131

105

49

143

____

____

Sibley

115

122

125

130

149

142

71

167

____

____

Stearns

67

70

77

79

89

65

32

120

____

____

Todd

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

43

41

11

63

____

____

Wright

72

81

84

91

107

115

78

136

____

____

East Central

Kanabec

30

33

32

34

31

22

15

42

____

____

Southwest

Cottonwood

96

101

107

108

143

130

75

170

____

____

Jackson

105

109

111

119

146

143

100

175

____

____

Lincoln

85

86

83

107

120

93

79

136

____

____

Lyon

85

89

92

100

119

117

81

150

____

____

Murray

87

89

94

100

120

119

77

150

____

____

Nobles

97

102

103

117

132

122

80

159

____

____

Pipestone

81

91

n/a

n/a

110

105

61

184

____

____

Redwood

92

99

98

104

122

120

85

155

____

____

South Central

Blue Earth

118

120

128

136

163

158

111

209

____

____

Brown

108

108

113

119

133

125

102

167

____

____

Faribault

115

122

122

134

152

141

115

184

____

____

Freeborn

117

123

126

n/a

143

152

40

175

____

____

Le Sueur

100

101

103

121

149

130

97

174

____

____

Martin

114

119

121

133

158

145

109

194

____

____

Nicollet

108

116

112

127

150

147

118

188

____

____

Rice

106

108

109

120

145

133

75

175

____

____

Steele

118

123

122

129

146

146

102

186

____

____

Waseca

106

108

113

126

136

131

83

166

____

____

Watonwan

101

110

114

122

148

126

108

175

____

____

Southeast

Dakota

84

96

100

n/a

121

108

93

150

____

____

Dodge

116

122

119

128

142

140

74

165

____

____

Fillmore

106

109

117

130

153

133

83

192

____

____

Goodhue

107

105

110

127

144

118

65

174

____

____

Mower

116

126

126

130

153

160

121

204

____

____

Olmsted

101

109

109

121

143

139

66

170

____

____

Winona

105

115

117

137

154

130

96

173

____

____

Under the 2004-2007 “Average” data columns, there is historical rent data for those four years. The land rental data listed is an average of all the farms reporting land rent for a specific county and year.

Under the 2008 crop year columns, the average rent is listed. The median or 50th percentile is also presented with half of the rent being less than this amount and half the rents being greater than this amount. In addition to these numbers, the 10th and 90th percentile are included to reflect the range of cash rents. Ten percent of the farmers reporting rents paid less than the rent number listed in the 10th percentile column. Similarly, ten percent of the farmers reporting rents paid more than the rent listed in the 90th percentile column.

Again, the 2009 and 2010 columns are for your use in listing your actual 2009 rent rate and for listing what you think may be your 2010 rate using the historical data listed in the tables.

Average Annual Change in Rent 2004-08

Following is a table showing average annual changes in land rental rates for the years 2004 through and including 2008 and the one-year change from 2007 to 2008. The calculations are weighted averages to compensate for differences in acres and rental rates from the various counties in each region. The land rental numbers used to calculate the percent change values are also from FINBIN. They are from the same data set used to calculate the county-level average land rental rates for 2004-2008 shown on the previous pages, but including farms in all counties in each region.

The annual 2007-2008 increase was far greater than the average annual increase over the five year period for most regions of the state. This increase was a response to the overall increase in the price of commodities during this period and the perceived increase in profitability of crop production. This major increase in one year had an impact on the five year average change too. For comparison, the five year average increase from 2003 – 2007 ranged from 1.73% in East Central to 4.93% in the Southeast region.

The percentage figures are not meant to predict future increases but are merely to document how regional rental rates have changed over the years.

Again, please note that even though the land rental numbers shown may not align with rents being bandied around the coffee shop, they are real and actual rent numbers reported by the farmers in farm management education programs throughout Minnesota.

Average Annual Change in Land Rental Rates 2004-2008 2007-2008

Northwest

4.56%

8.06%

West Central

5.71%

7.70%

Central

6.75%

13.89%

East Central

-1.94%

-11.56%

Southwest

8.21%

17.22%

South Central

7.84%

17.29%

Southeast

7.65%

14.55%

Summary

The land rental rates listed in the data tables are not meant to dictate or determine actual land rental rates. They are simply a listing of the historical land rental data from years 2004-2008 as reported in FINBIN.

Keep in mind that these rental rates include both family and long-term rental contracts. Rental rates between family members are generally lower than those between un-related parties. Long-term rental contracts generally do not change during the length of the contract and therefore may affect the average numbers used in the data calculations.

Those who wish to search FINBIN for land rental data specific to a county or region (assuming there are enough farmers reporting rent values) as well as other farm data can do so by going to www.finbin.umn.edu. Once there, select one of the data categories on the left side of the page for whole farm, crop, or livestock information. Simply select the data you want to retrieve by using the drop-down menus. There are a number of help buttons across the top of the page as well. Once your data choices are selected, click on “Generate Report” and await your results. If a sufficient number of farms meet your criteria, you will receive a report.

-

The information given in this publication is for educational purposes only. Reference to commercial products or trade names is made with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement by University of Minnesota Extension is implied.

Produced by Communication and Educational Technology Services, University of Minnesota Extension.


▲ Back to top