|
The Green, Green Grass
of a Dairy Pasture
Dennis Johnson, Extension Specialist - Dairy Production
Systems
April 23, 2005
There are many factors influencing
pasture growth and quality – soil fertility, forage
species, weeds, temperature, rain fall and management
of grazing pressure to name the main factors. Many pastures
are less productive than they might be if they have been
continuously grazed over the years. But those pastures
can often be turned into higher yielding acres with a
few inexpensive changes in management.
 |
| Figure 1. Grazing
at the proper stage of growth. |
Pastures should be grazed before the forages head out,
and then be given time to rest and recover between grazings.
Figure 1 shows the balance to seek between yield and forage
quality. Young lush rapidly growing forage is of the very
highest digestibility and protein content but yield is
low. Mature forage has maximum yield but quality is low.
The compromise for the dairy producer is to graze the pasture
when the plants have achieved most of their growth. Once
the area is grazed, the cows should be removed to another
paddock that is at the same stage. One of the challenges
of a grazing system is to sequence pasture growth so the
herd always has pasture that is at the right stage. Preferably,
the cows will graze one paddock for a day, and then move
to the next paddock. Moving cows rapidly through the pasture
system in the spring helps to establish a sequence of growth.
A rough rule of thumb for a typical legume-grass pasture
would be to allow 2-3 week intervals between grazings in
the spring, 3 to 4 weeks through most of the summer, and
4-6 weeks in the fall when growth is slow.
 |
| Figure 2. Organizing
a pasture system. |
A method for organizing a pasture system is illustrated
in Figure 2. A series of 8 paddocks have been arranged
according to topography and species. If cows were moved
from one paddock to the next every 3-4 days, the herd would
get through the sequence every 28-32 days. Daily allowances
of fresh forage can be offered by strip grazing each paddock.
This means placing a temporary fence at the 1/3 mark of
a paddock on day one, at the 2/3 point for day two, and
allow access to the entire paddock on day three.
It’s a fact of life that
the strongest pasture growth usually occurs during late
May and June in much of Minnesota. Northern Minnesota
may lag 2-3 weeks behind the south before hitting rapid
growth. One strategy for matching supply of forage to
herd requirements could be to hold a portion of the pasture
out of rotation for hay crop early in the summer, then
fit that portion into the grazing plan for July and August.
 |
| Figure 3. Seasonal
differences in pasture growth. |
Is there an economic gain from
investing in pasture renovation? A pasture renovation
experiment was conducted at the West Central Research
and Outreach Center, Morris. A bluegrass and brome grass
pasture that had been not been fertilized or rotationally
grazed was selected for the study. When the grass had
grown to 6 inches in the spring, it was sprayed with
a half dose of glyphosate – enough to brown
the grass but not kill it. A no-till seeder was used to
plant strips that included alfalfa, or red clover trefoil
mix, or a mixture of 13 grasses and legumes, or left unseeded
as a control. The investment in renovation was approximately
$50/ acre. Forage was clipped and weighed before each grazing.
The results in Table 1 show that all renovation treatments
led to significant increases in high quality pasture yield
(as compared to the control strip). The cost of renovation
was depreciated over three years. The cost of the additional
high quality pasture attributable to renovation was only
$10/ton.
A recent study has showed that pastures
rotationally grazed by heifers can be more profitable than
corn, soybeans or hay. In conclusion, grazing is a traditional
system that can be reintroduced to the economic, environmental
and social benefit of the dairy farm family.
Table
1. Performance of grazed forage for four pasture renovation
treatments.
| Pasture Renovation Treatment |
|
Year |
|
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
|
| |
--- Ton/Acre/Season --- |
| Alfalfa |
5.2 |
7.9 |
5.4 |
| Red clover/trefoil |
4.4 |
6.4 |
4.3 |
| Graziers mix |
5.7 |
6.4 |
4.9 |
| Control |
3.1 |
5.0 |
3.4 |
> LSD (0.05=0.48 ton/ac) is suitable
for comparisons within and between columns.
|