|
Taking Alfalfa Yield
Seriously
Paul R. Peterson, Extension Agronomist - Forages
January 15, 2005
Even though it’s still winter, let’s
get serious here – about growing alfalfa.
Alfalfa has so much to offer as a feed, soil builder, and
profit center within crop rotations on Minnesota dairy farms.
But too often, we don’t fully capitalize on opportunities
to get the most out of this important crop.
Let’s start with variety selection. All varieties
are definitely not created equal. Good varieties cost more.
But with alfalfa varieties, as with many things, you get
what you pay for. Sometimes cheaper varieties seem to work
well, but it’s often a crapshoot. Paying a little
extra for more dependable varieties is a much better strategy,
especially for the risk-averse. If seed of good varieties
costs $2 more per pound than that of “cheap” seed,
and alfalfa is seeded at 15 lb/ac, then the good seed costs
$30 more per acre than risky seed. If we assume that good-quality
alfalfa hay is worth $100 per ton, only 0.3 tons more forage
yield per acre is needed to pay for the “extra” seed
cost of the better variety. Harvested yield is by far the
largest driver of profitability with alfalfa production
(see table), so it’s worth our close attention. In
most cases, good varieties will easily yield 0.5 to
1.0 ton or more per acre per yearmore than
cheaper varieties. This makes the extra seed cost almost
trivial.
Producers should also use the Winter Survival Index (WSI)
rating when selecting varieties. This is especially important
if you want to capitalize on the high quality forage and
added profit of harvesting alfalfa in the fall. Alfalfa
producers are encouraged to check the results of the University
of Minnesota trials as an unbiased, trustworthy source
of variety performance information. The 2004 results are
now available on the web at www.maes.umn.edu or
in printed form (contact your county Extension office).
Consider strategies to increase
seeding-year alfalfa yields. Too often we settle for
one or two seeding-year harvests. Even in Minnesota ,
three to four seeding-year harvests are doable in most
years. Seeding early (April) and taking the first harvest
60 days after emergence puts the alfalfa producer on
pace for good seeding-year production. In addition, first-year
stands of winter-hardy alfalfa varieties (WSI ~2 or less)
are very tolerant of fall (October) harvesting, so the
producer shouldn’t leave a ton
of good-quality fall forage standing in spring-seeded fields.
Using Italian ryegrass as a nurse crop also offers a means
to boost seeding-year yields without reducing nutritional
value. Italian ryegrass spring-seeded at 5 lb/ac with alfalfa
provides a vegetative forage with high digestibility at
every seeding-year harvest. The ryegrass then dies in most
winters.
Fall cutting (or grazing) should
be considered more often (see table). Fall growth after
a late August cut can often exceed 1 ton of dry matter
per acre and be the highest quality forage of the season.
When this growth is left in the field over winter, the
residue can reduce the quality of next spring’s
first crop harvest. Fall cutting is most viable (least
risky) where modern, winter-hardy varieties are used,
where fertility (particularly K and pH) and drainage
are good, and where one growth period at some point during
the year has been allowed to reach an early flower stage
prior to harvest. Younger stands are more tolerant of
fall cutting than older stands, but recent data from
Wisconsin suggest that we may often try to keep alfalfa
stands longer than is profitable.
Univ. of Wisconsin Forage Agronomist
, Dan Undersander, recently conducted an economic analysis
of the profitability of different rotation lengths in
corn-alfalfa rotations on dairy farms. The analysis revealed
that three-year stands (including the seeding year) are
often more profitable than five-year stands. He cited
multiple reasons for this. One reason included declining
yield potential of even the best alfalfa varieties after
their third year. Another results from reduced fertilizer
and pesticide costs due to more opportunities to capitalize
on alfalfa’s
fixed N and fewer years of corn following corn.
Do you want to take your alfalfa
management more seriously? The above alfalfa production
strategies will be discussed in greater detail at three
University of Minnesota Forage Days to be held February
2-4. The purpose of the Forage Day program is to help
alfalfa producers develop productive and profitable strategies
to get more out of their alfalfa acres. A panel discussion
entitled “21 st Century
Alfalfa Production Management” will highlight the
program agenda at the three sites. Dr. Dan Undersander,
along with NDSU Forage Agronomist Dr. Dwain Meyer, and
Univ. of Minnesota Forage Agronomist Dr. Craig Sheaffer
will join a team of Univ. of Minnesota Extension Service
Forage Team members in delivering the program at each site.
The meeting dates and locations are Wed.,
Feb. 2 at the St. Charles Community Center (local
contact -- Lisa Behnken, lbehnken@umn.edu,
507-280-2867); Thurs., Feb. 3 at the Freeport
Community Center (local contact -- Dan
Martens, marte011@umn.edu,
800-964-4929); and Friday, Feb. 4 at the
Detroit Lakes Holiday Inn (local contacts
-- Doug Holen, holen009@umn.edu,
218-998-5787 and Gene Krause, kraus018@umn.edu,
218-463-0295).
The program at all locations will run from 10:00am to
3:00pm, with registration beginning at 9:30am. The registration
fee is $30/person which includes lunch, the new edition
of the comprehensive North Central region Alfalfa Management
Guide, proceedings of all meeting presentations, the
Jan. 2005 Minnesota Variety Trials Results, the
Winter issue of AFGC’s quarterly publication The
Forage Leader, and other handouts.
For further information, contact one of the above local
site individuals or me (peter072@umn.edu,
612-625-3747).
High
yields and October cutting maximized net returns
from alfalfa at Rosemount , MN (data
from two 3-year trials; Sheaffer and Marten, 1990). |
| Cuts/Year |
Cutting
Dates |
Avg.
Yield (T/ac) |
Yield Range |
Digestibility
(%, in vitro) |
Return
over Costs |
3 |
6/4,
7/14, 9/1 |
4.9 |
3.9–6.2 |
59.0 |
$ 387 |
4 |
5/24,
6/25, 8/4, 9/1 |
4.1 |
2.9–5.4 |
65.3 |
$ 342 |
4 |
5/24,
6/25, 8/4, 9/15 |
4.4 |
2.9-5.9 |
63.6 |
$ 396 |
4 |
5/24,
6/25, 8/4, 10/15 |
4.5 |
3.2-5.3 |
59.7 |
$ 371 |
4 |
6/4,
7/14, 9/1, 10/15 |
5.1 |
3.9-6.2 |
60.0 |
$ 420 |
|