Minnesota soybean growers who deal with iron deficiency
chlorosis (IDC) have seen them many times. Those green
soybeans that appear in the wheel tracks across areas of
yellow soybeans have always been a mystery. They are usually
associated with the last pass of the field cultivator.
They’ve been a mystery with no good explanation for
the cause for several years.
These green tracks are important because an explanation
for the cause might lead to development of management practices
that would reduce the severity of IDC. So, a research project
was established in 2004 to focus on developing an explanation
for the cause of the observation. To conduct this project,
green wheel tracks were found in fields of soybean producers
in Redwood and Yellow Medicine counties. In the Yellow
Medicine county field, green soybeans were evident over
a recently installed tile line. So, that location was also
included in the research.
In an effort to get an explanation, several soil and
plant samples were collected where the soybeans in the
wheel track were green. The same measurements were taken
where the yellow soybeans were next to those that were
green. These measurements included:
- soil moisture at depths of 0 to 3, 3 to 6, 6 to 9,
and 9 to 12 inches
- bulk density (a measure of compaction) at depths of
3 to 6, 6 to 9, and 9 to 12 inches
- weight of whole plants
- concentration of iron in the
plants
- uptake of iron
- weight of roots in the upper portion
of the root zone (0 to 6 inches)
- carbon dioxide production
at a depth of 0 to 4 inches
The measurements listed above were taken in mid-July.
The measurement of carbon dioxide production continued
into early August. The results for the locations in Redwood
and Yellow Medicine counties are listed in Tables 1 and
2 (below) respectively.
After reviewing the information collected, we conclude
that we still don’t have a good explanation for the
green soybeans growing over the wheel tracks. As might
be expected, plant weight was reduced where the soybeans
were yellow. Root growth is usually associated with the
above ground growth of the plant and roots were larger
where the soybeans were green.
There was some variability among sites; but, soil moisture
content was not substantially different where the soybean
plants were green. Bulk density, measured as grams per
cubic centimeter (g/cc) is a reflection of soil compaction.
Bulk density can have a substantial impact on root growth
and subsequent nutrient uptake. At the locations used in
this study, bulk density was variable, but not directly
related to either plant or root growth.
Soil properties (pH, P, K, soluble salt, carbonates)
were not related to the growth of green soybeans. At any
location, these properties were nearly the same where both
green and yellow soybeans were growing.
Considering all locations, there were consistent differences
in the concentration of carbon dioxide at the 0 to 6 inch
depth of the root zone. In all cases, concentrations of
this gas were substantially higher where the green soybeans
were growing. These higher concentrations could be the
result of larger plants growing or they could be the cause
of the green soybeans. The data collected in 2004 do not
provide an explanation for the dilemma.
This project will not end with the information gathered
in 2004. Based on the information gathered, we intend to
make additional measurements in 2005. So, we will be looking
for green wheel tracks. We need help to identify these
fields. So, if green wheel tracks appear where iron deficiency
chlorosis is a problem, please call (612) 625-6210 or send
an e-mail (rehmx001@umn.edu).
Table 1. Measurement of soil properties and plant
growth where green soybeans in wheel tracks were observed
in RedwoodCounty in
2004.
|
Location |
|
Redwood
(W) |
Redwood
(D) |
Measurement |
green
soybeans |
yellow
soybeans |
green
soybeans |
yellow
soybeans |
root weight (grams/plant)
|
0.408
|
0.207
|
0.243
|
0.156
|
plant weight (grams/plant)
|
2.9
|
1.9
|
1.2
|
1.1
|
soil moisture (0 to 3 in), %
|
21.0
|
18.9
|
24.5
|
24.4
|
soil moisture (3 to 6 in), %
|
24.7
|
25.3
|
23.5
|
24.6
|
soil moisture (6 to 9 in), %
|
23.7
|
25.7
|
23.3
|
23.2
|
| soil moisture (9 to 12 in), % |
23.7 |
27.3 |
23.9 |
24.1 |
| bulk density (3 to 6 in), g/cc |
1.31 |
1.28 |
1.40 |
1.34 |
| bulk density (6 to 9 in), g/cc |
1.25 |
1.33 |
1.40 |
1.35 |
| bulk density (9 to 12 in), g/cc |
1.33 |
1.29 |
1.51 |
1.49 |
carbon dioxide produced
(1st sampling), ppm |
6958
|
3960 |
7466
|
6112 |
carbon dioxide produced
(2nd sampling), ppm |
6749
|
4545
|
3096
|
2903 |
carbon dioxide produced
(3rd sampling), ppm |
9253 |
6484 |
6237 |
4467 |
| pH |
8.1 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
8.2 |
| phosphorus (Olsen), ppm |
9.7 |
10.3 |
6.5 |
7.3 |
| potassium, ppm |
183 |
183 |
192 |
188 |
| soluble salts |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.43 |
0.40 |
| carbonates, % |
8.4 |
9.0 |
9.5 |
9.9 |
Table 2. Measurement of soil properties and plant
growth where green soybeans were observed in Yellow Medicine County in
2004.
|
Location |
|
YM-1 |
YM-2* |
Measurement |
green soybeans |
yellow
soybeans |
green soybeans |
yellow
soybeans |
root weight (grams/plant) |
0.243 |
0.156 |
0.315 |
0.214 |
plant weight (grams/plant) |
2.7 |
1.4 |
2.4 |
1.3 |
soil moisture (0 to 3 in), % |
23.6 |
25.6 |
24.7 |
26.0 |
soil moisture (3 to 6 in), % |
21.6 |
26.3 |
20.6 |
24.6 |
soil moisture (6 to 9 in), % |
21.6 |
25.4 |
21.6 |
24.5 |
| soil moisture (9 to 12 in), % |
20.7 |
23.6 |
23.8 |
22.3 |
| bulk density (3 to 6 in), g/cc |
1.30 |
1.25 |
1.26 |
1.14 |
| bulk density (6 to 9 in), g/cc |
1.41 |
1.68 |
1.29 |
1.27 |
| bulk density (9 to 12 in), g/cc |
1.41 |
1.43 |
1.31 |
1.35 |
| carbon dioxide produced, ppm |
3109
|
3057 |
2500 |
2554 |
| pH |
8.2 |
8.1 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
| phosphorus (Olsen), ppm |
27 |
23 |
14 |
26 |
| potassium, ppm |
250 |
244 |
146 |
202 |
| soluble salts |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
| carbonates, % |
8.2 |
8.7 |
2.6 |
4.8 |
*At this location, the green soybeans were growing
over a recently installed tile line.
[printer-friendly pdf version
of this article]
|