U of M Extension Home : U of M Home

Gold University of Minnesota M. Skip to main content.University of Minnesota. Home page.

Minnesota Crop News > 2001-2008 Archives

December 20, 2004

Selection of Glyphosate-Resistant Weeds

Jeff Gunsolus, University of Minnesota, Bev Durgan, University of Minnesota, Chris Boerboom, University of Wisconsin
Kevin Bradley, University of Missouri, Bob Hartzler, Iowa State University, Mike Owen, Iowa State University
Bill Johnson, Purdue University , Jim Kells, Michigan State University, Mark Loux, Ohio State University
Dawn Nordby, University of Illinois, Christy Sprague, Michigan State University, Bryan Young, Southern Illinois University

It is well known that glyphosate-resistant horseweed (also known as marestail) populations have been selected in Roundup Ready soybean and cotton cropping systems. Resistance was first reported in Delaware in 2000, a mere 5 years after the introduction of Roundup Ready soybean. Since that initial report, glyphosate-resistant horseweed is now reported in 12 states and is estimated to affect 1.5 million acres in Tennessee alone.

A person could ask if this is any indication of what might lie ahead. On one hand, it has been proposed in a popular advertisement that glyphosate-resistant weeds are unlikely to occur if glyphosate is frequently used, as long as glyphosate is applied at full rates. The comments in this advertisement, in part, are based on several long-term university studies of Roundup Ready cropping systems. However, the question that a person should ask about these studies is whether or not they can prove that resistance will or won’t happen. It is our belief that these studies are not large enough to test if resistance will develop. For example, the University of Wisconsin has a 7 year Roundup Ready cropping system trial. This trial has horseweed in the no-till plots. Despite burndown and in-crop treatments with glyphosate, glyphosate-resistant horseweed has not developed in these plots. Since this trial did not find glyphosate-resistant horseweed, does this mean that glyphosate-resistant horseweed cannot develop? Does it mean that the resistant horseweed in Ohio or Tennessee or Delaware is not truly resistant? Obviously not. Small scale trials cannot prove that some event will not occur when a larger scale is considered. In total, these Roundup Ready cropping system trials may only be testing continuous glyphosate use on perhaps 50 acres, which is an extremely small fraction relative to total glyphosate. The true real test to determine if a rare event like glyphosate-resistant weeds will develop is actually being tested on the tens of millions of acres of Roundup Ready corn, soybean, and cotton that are sprayed each year.

Many weed scientists across the Midwest have warned of the potential for additional glyphosate-resistant weeds if a “high selection pressure” is maintained. In this case, “high selection pressure” refers to the repeated use of glyphosate without interruption by herbicides with other modes of action or other weed management practices. This potential was confirmed this week at the North Central Weed Science Society Meeting where glyphosate-resistant common ragweed weed was reported. This is the first report of glyphosate-resistance for common ragweed. It was identified in a Missouri no-till soybean field that has been in continuous soybean production (with some double crop wheat) for many years and in Roundup Ready soybean since 1996. The common ragweed in this field had a high selection pressure for glyphosate with one or more glyphosate applications per year. This is the second example of a glyphosate-resistant weed that has developed in a Roundup Ready cropping system with high selection pressure. We do not know which glyphosate-resistant weed will be the next to develop or when it will occur, but high selection pressure will likely result in additional cases of resistance.

Midwest weed scientists believe in the value that glyphosate and Roundup Ready crops offer to growers. We hope that growers and crop advisors will evaluate how they use glyphosate and the Roundup Ready technologies to gain the value of these technologies without increasing the risk of resistance.

 Ideally, we recommend:

  • Alternating glyphosate use with other herbicide modes of action between years.
  • Incorporate appropriate integrated weed management practices such as soil-applied herbicides and cultivation with the use of glyphosate.
  • In no-till systems, tank mix glyphosate with another mode of action like 2,4-D in burndown treatments.

 

 
Trouble seeing the text? | Contact U of M | Privacy

©2005 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.

Last modified on June 2, 2009