Fertilizer use is a key management practice
for growers who seek to maximize profit from their soybean
acres. Previous research on soybean phosphorus fertility in
NW Minnesota had not shown a positive yield response with band
or broadcast applications. New soybean cultivars with higher
yield potentials have been developed for the region over the
past ten years prompted the idea to conduct a phosphorus rate
study to determine if the phosphorus nutritional needs of the
crop were still being met from residual phosphorus in the soil.
The soybean phosphorus rate study was established at the Ron
Peterson farm northeast of Crookston, MN. on a Ulen loamy fine
sand soil type with an Olsen phosphorus level of 7ppm. Phosphorus
treatments of 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 pounds of P2O5/acre were applied prior to planting using a randomized complete
block design with four replications. The soybean cultivar Legend
009 was seeded in 22 inch rows and maintained during the growing
season using normal cultural practices by the grower and harvest
was performed with a plot combine. Yield, protein content and
oil percentage were measured and all adjusted to 13 percent
moisture basis.
There was a highly significant linear yield (P=.001) and protein
concentration (P=.0002) response to phosphorus rates as can
be seen in Figures 1 & 2. Soybean yields increased from
37.6 bushels per acre with no added phosphorus to 43.1 bushels
per acre with the addition of 90 pounds of P2O5..
Protein concentration increased from 31.8% with no added phosphorus
to 33.8% with the addition of 90 pounds of P2O5 per acre (Table
1).
Additional trials are needed on other cultivars and soil test
levels to confirm the need for phosphorus nutrition for increased
soybean yield and protein concentrations.
Figure1.
Soybean grain yield.

Figure 2.
Soybean protein concentration.

Table 1. Soybean yield, protein, oil and economic return/
acre.
|
Treatment
|
Yield
|
Protein
|
Oil
|
Yield Increase |
Gross* return |
Net** return
|
lbs. P2O5/acre |
bushels/acre
|
percent
|
percent
|
|
bu/acre
|
$/acre
|
$/acre
|
| 0 |
37.63 |
31.83 |
16.53 |
0 |
$ - |
$ - |
| 15 |
40.23 |
32.13 |
16.38 |
2.60 |
$13.00 |
$9.70 |
| 30 |
40.10 |
32.75 |
16.53 |
2.47 |
$12.35 |
$5.75 |
| 45 |
40.93 |
32.85 |
16.18 |
3.30 |
$16.50 |
$6.60 |
| 60 |
41.55 |
32.50 |
15.73 |
3.92 |
$19.60 |
$6.40 |
| 75 |
42.55 |
33.40 |
16.55 |
4.92 |
$24.60 |
$8.10 |
| 90 |
43.13 |
33.75 |
16.25 |
5.50 |
$27.50 |
$7.70 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| LSD (.05%) |
3.32 |
0.96 |
N.S. |
*
based on $5.00 local price |
| |
|
|
|
**
based on P2O5 at $0.22/lb. |
I would like to extend a special thanks to Ron Peterson for
providing the research site, the Minnesota Soybean Research
and Promotional Council for partial financial support and the
Northwest Research and Outreach Center at Crookston for assistance
with the study. |