|
Minnesota Crop News > 2001-2008 Archives
October
7, 2002
Can
Subsoiling Increase Crop Yields in Minnesota?
Jodi DeJong-Hughes, West Central Research and Outreach Center
and George Rehm, Extension Nutrient Management Specialist
Every so often there is
interest about subsoiling that is initiated by a favorable
report from some locality. But can that local report be applied to different regions
of the US and, in particular, to our Minnesota glacial till
soils? This article
will address the concepts behind subsoiling and the research
that has been conducted.
Subsoiling is a very
aggressive tillage operation that breaks up the soil usually
to a depth of 12-18
inches. The theory behind subsoiling is to shatter a compacted layer
deep in the soil to allow increased water movement, better
aeration of the roots, and access to additional nutrients
for plant growth.
Soil
compaction can be associated with a majority of field operations
that are often performed when soils are wet and, thus, more
susceptible to compaction. Heavy
equipment and tillage implements can damage the soil structure. Soil structure is important because it
determines the ability of a soil to hold and conduct water,
nutrients, and air necessary for plant growth and is the
number one defense against soil compaction. There has been
a great deal of research conducted on deep plowing with the
goal of alleviating subsoil compaction. The
results are mixed. It is difficult to accurately predict
the effects subsoiling has on crop yield because of multiple
factors, such as: the level and depth of compaction, soil
water content, subsequent traffic, variable weather conditions,
the crop grown, and tillage methods.
Research in
Michigan and Ohio has reported increased yields of 3-4% for
the following crop year. However, Michigan and Ohios soils
were formed from lake deposits and not formed by glacial
till (though this research was conducted on soil formed by
glacial deposits). Most
of the soils in Minnesota were formed by glacial till. Therefore,
data from Michigan and Ohio does not necessarily apply to
Minnesota conditions. A
majority of research conducted in the Midwest, on glacial
till soils, has reported no change in yield or a decrease
in yield due to the effects of subsoiling. As
early as the 1950s, Midwest researchers were seeing
no effect or negative effects from subsoiling. Research
in Iowa reported no meaningful changes in corn production. They
found that subsoiling at a depth of 24 inches decreased the
corn yield by 9.7 bushels the first year and 6.4 bushels
per acre the following year.
There has been extensive
soil compaction and subsequent deep ripping research conducted
in Southern Minnesota by Dr. Ward Voorhees and Jane Johnson
of the USDA/ARS North Central Soil Conservation Research
Laboratory. Details
of this research effort are in an MS thesis by Jane Johnson
titled,Soil and Plant Responses to High Axle Load Wheel
Traffic and Subsoil Tillage. Research
results of this study reported that subsoiling to a depth
of 16 inches failed to increase yields for neither corn or
soybeans and decreased corn yield 11 bushels per acre in
one of the two years.
One reason why subsoiling fails to increase
crop yield, may be due to unfavorable soil moisture conditions
at the time of subsoiling. If
the soil is wet, subsoiling will be ineffective. To
achieve effective subsoiling the operator must be certain
the soil is fracturing to the depth of the shank. If
the shank is reaching a depth of 18 inches it is very difficult
to determine if the soil is shattering at that depth.
Another
reason for the failure of subsoiling to increase crop yield
is that subsequent wheel traffic can recompact the loosened
soil. Loosened
subsoil has very little bearing capacity, meaning it cant
support much weight. Johnson and Voorhees discovered that an ordinary 2-wheel drive
tractor, that weighed less than 5 ton an axle, was sufficiently
heavy enough to recompact the loosened soil down to a depth
of 16 inches. Similarly, Randell Reeder, an Ohio State
Universitys Agricultural Engineer, has shown that within
the tire tracks, two passes of a tractor recompacted the
soil to a condition as bad as or worse than before subsoiling. For
that reason, controlled traffic becomes an important management
tool. When
a farmer has confirmed that his field has a compacted layer,
he should consider the following steps to increase the chance
of obtaining beneficial effects from subsoiling, 1.) When
subsoiling, make sure the soil is dry and fractures to the
depth of the shank, and 2.) Avoid recompacting loosened soil
by using the controlled traffic concept. Otherwise, the fuel, time, and increased horsepower that are needed to reach extreme
soil depths will not be economical for the farmer. |