What a growing season it has been! Most of
the state has had rainfall well above average, and one or more
rainfall events that has caused some significant flooding.
Where fields have not been flooded out, the ample precipitation
has translated into lots of forage production. Unfortunately,
however, this has not led to an ample supply of high quality
forage in the silo or barn. The high humidity and frequent
rainfall have made it difficult to put up high quality hay
and haylage throughout much of Minnesota this summer, and thus
many livestock producers are facing a shortage of high quality
forage as we head into fall and winter. Many will compensate
by feeding more corn silage this winter, but keep in mind that
we still have an opportunity to conserve more high quality
alfalfa this year.
Thanks to continued warm weather and precipitation through
mid September, alfalfa and other forages generally have continued
to grow rapidly. Many fields thus have an abundance of September
growth that we could harvest. Traditionally, weve been
cautious about cutting alfalfa in the fall due to concerns
that it will increase the risk of winter injury to the stand.
This was a good general recommendation 25 years ago, but our
increased understanding of genetic and management factors affecting
winter survival enable us to now be much less conservative
about fall cutting, especially when we face the prospect of
a shortage of high quality forage and high prices for hay purchasing.
The two main reasons that fall cutting has traditionally been
discouraged are 1) a concern about sending alfalfa into the
winter with limited energy reserves in the roots, and 2) a
desire to maintain more material on the field to catch insulating
snow cover. This is sound logic and still applies today, but
this conservative approach should no longer dominate our fall
management decision-making. We now know that there are a number
of other controllable factors that influence an alfalfa stands
potential for winter injury:
- Stand age: younger stands are less susceptible
to winter injury than older stands
- Variety selection: modern, winter hardy, multi-disease
resistant varieties are less susceptible to winter
injury than are older varieties
- Soil pH: alfalfa in soils with pH 6.5 to 7.0
is less susceptible to winter injury than when grown
at pH 6.0 or less.
- Soil K: high soil K levels reduce the likelihood
of winter injury
- Soil drainage: winter injury is less likely
in well drained versus poorly drained fields or fields
that are very wet in fall.
When the above conditions are in the "low risk" category,
the chances of fall cutting causing winter injury are low.
In essence, healthy, well-managed alfalfa plants with good
genetics are not very susceptible to winter injury when cut
in the fall, especially if that cutting comes close to the
time of the first killing frost (early to mid October). The
risk is further reduced if stands have not been cut frequently
earlier in the season. In other words, if the fall cut is only
the 3 rd cutting of the season, the risk of
a winter injury is minimal.
Table 1 shows data from a cutting management study with variable
fall cutting dates conducted in Minnesota in the mid 1980s.
The data represent 3 years of cutting treatments on 3 alfalfa
varieties averaged over 2 experiments (total of 6 years of
data). Note that within 3- or 4-cut systems, treatments with
September 15 or October 15 harvest dates did not have reduced
yield compared to treatments with the last cut September 1.
In addition, the minimum single season yield obtained for each
harvest regime over the 6 years of testing (as shown by the
yield range) never occurred during the final year of cutting.
In fact, maximum yields were sometimes obtained during the
final (3 rd) year of cutting. This further indicates
that fall cutting was generally not detrimental to long-term
yields or stands. Interestingly, a 4-cut system with the final
two cuttings on September 1 and October 15 produced among the
highest total season yields. This cutting schedule seems particularly
relevant this year, with first cutting generally being late
statewide due to an unusually cool May. It is important to
note, however, that within that system, alfalfa was allowed
to mature to flower at two of the four cuttings; this compromised
quality to some degree, but allowed plants to accumulate a
high level of carbohydrate reserves prior to two of the four
cuttings. Nevertheless, the data clearly show that fall cutting
was not detrimental to yields of stands that were subjected
to cutting treatments for 3 consecutive years.
Table 1. Influence of cutting frequency and timing on total
season yield and season average forage quality of alfalfa at
Rosemount, MN (average of two 3-year experiments).
|
Cuts per Year |
Avg. Cutting Dates |
Avg. Total Season Yield |
Yield Range |
Season Avg. Digestible DM |
Season Avg. CP |
| |
|
Tons DM/acre |
% DM |
|
3 |
6/4, 7/14, 9/1 |
4.9 |
3.9-6.2 |
59 |
18 |
| |
6/4, 7/14, 9/15 |
4.7 |
3.5-5.7 |
57 |
18 |
| |
6/4, 7/14, 10/15 |
4.8 |
3.5-5.8 |
54 |
17 |
|
4 |
5/24, 6/25, 8/4, 9/1 |
4.1 |
2.9-5.4 |
65 |
21 |
| |
5/24, 6/25, 8/4, 9/15 |
4.4 |
2.9-5.9 |
64 |
20 |
| |
5/24, 6/25, 8/4, 10/15 |
4.5 |
3.2-5.3 |
60 |
19 |
| |
6/4, 7/14, 9/1, 10/15 |
5.1 |
3.9-6.2 |
60 |
19 |
|
LSD (0.05) |
|
0.4 |
|
2 |
1 |
Source: Sheaffer, C.C., and G.C. Marten. 1990. J. Prod. Agric.
3:486-491.
Depending upon harvest frequency, under good September growing
conditions, a producer can expect to harvest about a ton of
dry matter per acre of high quality alfalfa in October. Having
drying conditions adequate to produce hay can be a challenge
(preservatives may be an option), but appropriate moisture
for haylage is generally not difficult to achieve. Grazing
is another option, as long as bloat precautions are taken.
Summary Points
Where you have a foot or more of growth in October of
a modern, winter hardy, multi-disease resistant alfalfa
variety on a good alfalfa soil with adequate potassium;
consider harvesting at least your older alfalfa stands
to provide more high quality forage for this winter. Alfalfa
stands typically begin to lose yield potential after their
third year anyway, so where high quality forage is a priority,
concerns about damaging stands more than 3 years old should
generally not weigh heavily in the decision of whether
or not to cut in the fall.
One potentially high risk factor this fall is soil moisture.
Fields that are very wet going into the winter have a higher
risk of winter injury if a fall cutting is taken.
If youre of a conservative bent and/or in an area
where snow tends to blow off fields with short stubble,
you may wish to leave strips of uncut alfalfa to help catch
snow.
Its still preferable to avoid cutting in the "heart" of
the fall critical period (i.e. mid-late September). Better
to target early (northern MN) to mid (southern MN) October,
near the time when a killing frost is likely and thus continued
growth unlikely.
|