|
This past winter, intensive wheat management has received
a lot of attention. In particular, Concord Environmental Equipment
has been promoting a complete Intensive Wheat Management System.
Some key elements of the system have been adopted from practices
in Europe. The management decisions that are being discussed
are to increase your seeding rates, to use tramlines, and to
use fungicides to increase grain yield. One component of the
intensive wheat management that is discussed as well is to
split your total nitrogen requirement into two applications;
one at planting and one at the 5 to 6 leaf stage. Many of the
elements of the intensive wheat management system are very
valid and good agronomic practices that are applicable for
spring wheat production in the Northern Plains. However, we
would like to provide some background to the split application
of nitrogen as discussed by Concord Environmental Equipment.
One of the premises used to promote the split application of
nitrogen is that tillers waste valuable nitrogen and are not
needed. The
recommendation is to starve the crop for nitrogen and limit the number
of tillers and then provide adequate nitrogen for the main stem and first tiller.
If the standard University of Minnesota recommendations for seeding rates are
used, the population itself, not nitrogen, because of interplant competition
rather than nitrogen is the limiting factor in the formation of the number of
tillers. In addition, the wheat
plant recycles the nutrients in aborted tillers.
The idea of splitting the total nitrogen requirement of the
crop over multiple applications was first discussed in the
early nineties. These discussions were the result of the work
that had been done in Europe at the time. The applicability
of that work to our region was questioned and Drs. John Lamb
and George Rehm, Extension soil scientists with the University
of Minnesota, and their co-workers conducted research throughout
western and northwestern Minnesota, which compared a single
pre-plant application to split (pre-plant + top dressed) applications
of N fertilizer to hard red spring wheat. The trials were conducted
at twenty-one sites in farmers fields over three years.
Three levels of pre-plant soil N plus fertilizer N were developed
(50, 100, and 150 lbs N A-1) by soil testing to
a depth of 2 feet and broadcasting urea in appropriate amounts
prior to planting to obtain the desired N levels (soil test
nitrate-N + fertilizer N). Five rates of top-dressed N fertilizer
(0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 lbs N A-1) were applied to
the wheat at the 4 to 5 leaf stage within each level of pre-plant
soil N using ammonium nitrate (dry). Grain yield (Figure 1)
and grain protein (Figure 2) were used to evaluate the effects
of the various N management strategies.
Applying N fertilizer as a top dress to the hard red spring
wheat increased grain yields and grain protein only when there
was not sufficient pre-plant N available (Figure 1). Top dressing
45 lbs N per acre increased grain yields by 6 bushel per acre when
the pre-plant N level was 50 lbs per acre. When 100 lb N per
acre was available prior to planting, 15 to 30 lbs top dressed
N resulted in a 2 bushel per acre yield increase. In both cases
grain protein increased by about a half to one percent. When
the pre-plant soil N level was 150 lbs per acre there was no
grain yield or grain protein increase with applications of
top dressed N. Interestingly, maximum grain yields when
pre-plant soil N was limited to 50 lbs per acre never equaled
those produced by greater pre-plant soil N levels regardless
of how much additional N was applied as a top dress.

The data strongly suggest that a split application N management
strategy is not necessary to obtain optimum grain yields and
grain protein in the Northern Plains. The data further suggests
that a strategy where pre-plant soil N is maintained at low
levels with subsequent applications of top dress N may result
in lower grain yields than a strategy where adequate amounts
of N are applied prior to planting.
An obvious difference between the work done by John Lamb and
George Rehm and the approach taken by the Intensive Wheat Management
System as promoted by Concord Environmental Equipment is that
the later uses a liquid fertilizer rather than dry fertilizer
as a source of nitrogen. No direct comparisons are available.
The nitrogen has to move from the soil surface into the root
zone to be effective. Adequate precipitation, even with the
use of a liquid source of nitrogen, is essential in that regard.
In sandy soils, where leaching is a problem, a split application
of nitrogen at the 5 to 6 leaf stage may be very valid strategy
to increase the efficiency of nitrogen use by the plant. In
all other cases a single application of nitrogen prior to planting
appears to be most economical. |