Copper (Cu), a micronutrient essential for
crop production, is supplied in adequate amounts by most of
Minnesota's agricultural soils. The organic soils are an exception.
Past research has shown that addition of this nutrient to a
fertilizer program produces substantial increases in yields
when small grains are grown on these soils.
More recently, there had been reports that use of Cu fertilizers
had increased the yield of hard red spring wheat grown on mineral
soils in Canada. After considering the Canadian reports, it
seemed that an evaluation of Cu for hard red spring production
on the mineral soils of northwestern Minnesota was appropriate.
This evaluation was conducted in the fields of six cooperating
growers in 2000 and 2001. The location of the sites and the
associated relevant soil properties are summarized in Table
1. Copper was supplied as two sources (chelate, sulfate) to
provide 6 and 12 lb. Cu per acre. The Cu fertilizers along
with fertilizers to supply adequate N, P2O5,
and K2O were broadcast and incorporated before planting.
The cooperating farmer planted the wheat. Appropriate herbicides
were applied post emergence for weed control. Grain yields
were measured with a plot combine. Yields were corrected to
13.5% moisture.
Table 1. Relevant soil properties for the experimental
sites used for the evaluation of Cu fertilizers.
| Site |
Year |
Cu Soil Test |
Soil Texture |
| |
|
ppm |
|
| Norman |
2000 |
0.36
|
loamy fine sand |
| East Polk |
2000 |
0.88 |
silty clay loam |
| Marshall |
2000 |
0.29 |
loamy fine sand |
| Norman |
2001 |
0.30 |
loamy fine sand |
| East Polk |
2001 |
0.60 |
silty clay loam |
| West Polk |
2001 |
0.30 |
loamy fine sand |
Except for the Norman County site in 2000, all soils had an
organic matter content greater than 2%. The lower soil test
values for Cu were associated with the soils that had the loamy
fine sand texture. Grain yields are summarized in Table 2.
The effect of only one rate of Cu (12 lb. per acre) is shown.
Table 2. Yield of hard red spring wheat as affected by the
application of 12 lb. Cu per acre.
| |
|
Cu Rate and Source |
| Site |
Year |
none |
12 (sulfate) |
12 (chelate) |
| |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - bu./acre
- - - - - - - - - - - |
| Norman |
2000 |
50.4a* |
54.9b |
57.2b |
| East Polk |
2000 |
66.2a |
61.9a |
67.9a |
| Marshall |
2000 |
47.4a |
47.9a |
51.1a |
| Norman |
2001 |
45.2a |
47.3a |
40.8a |
| East Polk |
2001 |
57.0a |
55.5a |
55.9a |
| West Polk |
2001 |
59.5a |
59.6a |
60.7a |
*Treatment means in any row followed by the same letter are
not significantly different at the 0.05 confidence level.
In the two years of the evaluation, Cu fertilization produced
a significant increase in yield at only one location (Norman,
2000). Both sources of Cu had an equal effect on yield. Yields
resulting from the use of 6 lb. Cu per acre were the same as
yields produced by the use of 12 lb. Cu per acre.
In evaluating the response to Cu fertilization, it's important
to remember that the sandy site in Norman County in 2000 had
an organic matter content of less than 2.0%.
The results from this study are consistent with those of similar
studies in North Dakota. In those studies, a response to Cu
fertilization was only measured where sandy soils had a low
organic matter content.
The University of Minnesota recommendations for use of Cu
will not change. This micronutrient will be recommended when
small grains are grown on organic soils. Those who grown hard
red spring wheat on sandy soils with an organic matter content
of less than 2% may want to consider the broadcast application
of 6 lb. Cu per acre as copper sulfate. There is no firm guarantee
that this practice will increase yields.
|