|
Minnesota Crop News > 2001-2008 Archives
January 7, 2002
Liming
Soils for Soybean Production when Soils are Formed from Glacial
Till
George Rehm, Department of Soil, Water and Climate, St. Paul
Jeff Vetsch, Southern Research and Outreach Center, Waseca
Gyles Randall, Southern Research nd Outreach Center, Waseca
The corn-soybean rotation dominates the farm enterprises
in southern and southwestern Minnesota. In much of the region these
crops are grown on soils that were formed from calcareous glacial till
as a parent material. In the past, the pH of the surface soil (0
to 6 inches) was neutral or calcareous. With repeated application
of nitrogen fertilizers for corn production, the pH of these surface
soils has dropped to the range of 5.5 to 6.0. The standard recommendation
would be to apply lime to these soils for soybean production. Because
of the calcareous subsoil, however, the effect of liming these soils
has been questioned. Therefore, trials have been conducted at three
locations (Southern Research and Outreach Center, Jackson County, Faribault
County) to evaluate the effectiveness of liming these soils for soybean
production. The results of this research are discussed separately
in the following sections.
Southern Research and Outreach Center
This study was initiated in August of 1998 on a Nicollet clay loam. Initial
soil samples were collected to a depth of 48 inches and pH was measured (see
Table 1). Although acid in the depths of 0 to 6 and 6 to 12 inches,
the pH rose rapidly below 12 inches.
Table 1. Initial soil pH values at the site used for the lime
study at the Southern Research and Outreach Center.
| Soil Depth |
pH |
| inch |
|
| 0 to 6 |
5.4 |
| 6 to 12 |
6.0 |
| 12 to 18 |
6.4 |
| 18 to 24 |
6.7 |
| 24 to 30 |
7.2 |
| 30 to 36 |
7.6 |
| 36 to 42 |
8.0 |
| 42 to 48 |
8.2 |
Both dolomitic (calcium + magnesium carbonate) and calcitic (calcium
carbonate only) liming materials were applied. These materials
were incorporated in August. The lime applications with incorporation
were repeated in October of 2000. Annual applications of gypsum
and calcium chloride were included in this study. Soil pH was
measured in mid-summer in 2000 and 2001. Soybean yields were
measured in 1999-2001. Soybean yields as affected by treatment
used are summarized in Table 2. Soil pH values are listed in
Table 3.
Table 2. Soybean yield (1999 through 2001 average) as affected
by two liming materials and neutral salts applied at various rates.
| Material Used |
Rate of Application* |
Soybean Yield (Ave. 1999-2001) |
| |
ton/acre |
bu/acre |
| control |
0 |
56.8 |
| dolomitic lime |
0.5 |
56.6 |
| dolomitic lime |
2.0 |
57.4 |
| dolomitic lime |
4.0 |
57.6 |
| dolomitic lime |
6.0 |
58.3 |
| dolomitic lime |
10.0 |
58.5 |
| calcitic lime |
0.2 |
57.5 |
| calcitic lime |
0.5 |
56.5 |
| calcitic lime |
1.0 |
57.5 |
| calcitic lime |
0.2 (annual) |
58.1 |
| gypsum |
0.2 (annual) |
55.9 |
*All treatments except for the two marked annual were applied on 9/98
and repeated on 10/00.
There was not a wide range in yields and soybean production was not affected
by either the material applied or the rate of application when all treatments
are considered. When comparing the rates of dolomitic lime, however,
the 1.7 bu. per acre increase from use of this source was statistically significant,
but would not have been economically profitable with current prices. In
other words, the soybeans did not respond positively to the use of lime at
this site.
There has been some suggestion that the use of gypsum may increase yield of
crops grown on these soils. Gypsum and calcium chloride have no direct
effect on soil pH. Use of these two materials did not increase soybean
yield. Gypsum can also be used to supply sulfur, if needed. Since
there was no increase in yield when this product was used, added sulfur was
apparently not needed for soybean production.
Table 3. Soil pH at a depth of 0 to 6 inches as affected by the
application of 2 liming materials and neutral salts.
| Material Used |
Date of Application* |
Soil pH |
| 2000 |
2001 |
| |
tons/acre |
|
|
| Control |
-- |
5.4 |
5.4 |
| dolomitic lime |
0.5 |
5.4 |
5.4 |
| dolomitic lime |
2.0 |
5.7 |
5.8 |
| dolomitic lime |
4.0 |
6.0 |
6.1 |
| dolomitic lime |
6.0 |
6.0 |
6.1 |
| dolomitic lime |
10.0 |
6.2 |
6.3 |
| calcitic lime |
0.2 |
5.3 |
5.4 |
| calcitic lime |
0.5 |
5.4 |
5.5 |
| calcitic lime |
1.0 |
5.6 |
5.9 |
| calcitic lime |
0.2 (annual) |
5.6 |
5.6 |
| gypsum |
0.2 (annual) |
5.3 |
5.4 |
*All treatments except for the two marked annual were
applied on 9/98 and repeated on 10/10.
The pH measurements in 2000 show the impact of a single lime application in
1998. The values for 2001 reflect the effect of two applications. When
the use of dolomitic lime is considered, pH increased as rate of application
increased and this would be expected. The low rates of calcitic lime
did not produce a substantial rise in pH. When these two sources are
compared, one is not superior to the other in changing soil pH. There is, however,
a substantial difference in the cost of the two materials. Use of low
rates of both dolomitic and calcitic lime had no measurable effect on soil
pH.
Soil pH was the same as the control when both calcium chloride and gypsum were
used. These materials are classified as "neutral salts" and,
therefore, should not be expected to change soil pH.
Trials in Jackson and Faribault Counties
The impact of lime on soybean production was also studied in the fields of
cooperating soybean producers. For the study in Jackson County, finely
ground lime was applied in early spring of 1999 and incorporated with a field
cultivator. The finely ground limestone was used so that neutralization
of the acidity could occur rapidly.
Finely ground limestone materials were applied in the fall of 2000 at the Faribault
County site and incorporated with a field cultivator the following spring.
Soil samples were collected to a depth of 60 inches prior to planting and the
results are summarized below.
| Depth |
Jackson County |
Faribault County |
| inches |
-------------- pH ----------------- |
| 0 to 6 |
5.6 |
5.5 |
| 6 to 12 |
6.0 |
5.7 |
| 12 to 24 |
6.5 |
6.3 |
| 24 to 36 |
7.3 |
6.7 |
| 36 to 48 |
7.9 |
7.3 |
| 48 to 60 |
8.1 |
7.7 |
As was the case at the site at the Southern Research and Outreach Center, soil
pH increased with depth. Below 12 inches, the pH rises to near neutral
then increases substantially with depth.
Calcitic lime was applied at two rates and one rate of dolomitic lime was used. The
calcitic lime had 1613 lb. of Effective Neutralizing Power (ENP) per ton while
the analysis of the dolomitic lime showed 1631 lb. (ENP) per ton. These
values are very close. Therefore, one ton per acre of calcitic lime should
produce the same results as one ton per acre of the dolomitic material.
The measured yields are listed in Table 4. In both fields, application
of both liming materials had no effect on soybean yield.
Table 4. Soybean yield as affected by lime source and rate of
application.
| Lime Source |
Rate of Application |
Location |
| Jackson County |
Faribault County |
| |
ton/acre |
bu./acre |
| none |
-- |
41.0 |
42.7 |
| calcitic |
2 |
42.1 |
43.4 |
| calcitic |
4 |
44.2 |
44.8 |
| dolomitic |
2 |
42.9 |
41.1 |
There are differences in yields shown in the table. These differences,
however are not statistically significant. Considering the cost of lime,
either much larger increases in yield or continued long-term responses would
be required to pay for the lime.
A consideration of the results from both studies leads to the conclusion that
application of lime is not a profitable management practice for soybeans grown
on soils that were formed from calcareous glacial till. It is important
to recognize, however, that many Minnesota soils were formed from parent material
that is not glacial till. The subsoil for this soil is frequently acid. Lime
should be an important component of the management package for soybean production
on these soils which have acid subsoils.
|