Engaging with the Public: A series of best practice tip sheets
How can we support more productive discussions?
Tip: Set ground rules
In public meetings, forums, hearings and other group settings, productive discussion is critical. Ground rules help a group start and maintain productive discussion. Ground rules clarify expectations for behavior in the meeting. In this tip sheet, we answer the question:
How can we start and maintain productive discussions?
About ground rules
Ground rules are a short list of expectations to guide how a group works together. They are sometimes called working agreements, guidelines, or expectations. While many public organizations use parliamentary procedure as a form of ground rules, such formal rules may not be sufficient or appropriate for guiding public discussion.
Effective ground rules help:
- Encourage respectful listening;
- Increase participation and the sharing of ideas and perspectives;
- Promote openness to points of view and increase learning;
- Prevent conflict and misunderstanding;
- Manage problems before and as they occur; and
- Build trust and a sense of safety among group participants.
Here are suggestions for ground rules that can be especially helpful for public meetings:
- This is a public discussion, not a debate. The purpose is not to win an argument, but to hear many points of view and explore many options and solutions.
- Everyone is encouraged to participate. You may be asked to share what you think, or we may ask for comments from those who haven't spoken. It is always OK to "pass" when you are asked to share a comment.
- No one or two individuals should dominate discussion. If you have already voiced your ideas, let others have an opportunity. When you speak, be brief and to the point.
- When you speak, state your name and where you live. In a public meeting, it is helpful to know who is speaking as well as where they live in the community.
- One person speaks at a time. Refrain from side conversations. Pay attention to the person speaking. If you think you will forget an idea that comes to mind, write it down.
- Listen to and respect other points of view. All of us bring information and ideas to contribute. People are more likely to contribute if they know they are respected.
- Do your best to understand the pros and cons of every option, not just those you prefer. Be as objective and fair-minded as you can be.
- Seek first to understand, not to be understood. Ask questions to seek clarification when you don't understand the meaning of someone's comments.
Groups can create ground rules in advance of the meeting, or with the group at the meeting. The group's size and purpose can determine how ground rules are set. In large public meetings, we recommend that meeting planners provide ground rules created in advance. This allows the group to focus on the meeting topic while having clear expectations for discussion. In smaller groups, creating expectations together as part of the meeting is a helpful first step to working and making decisions together, particularly in a group that will work together over time.
Once ground rules are clarified, leaders should confirm with the group that these rules will guide discussion. The group's agreement allows the leader or a group member to directly address an issue when a ground rule is not followed.
Having nine or fewer ground rules helps the group more easily remember and support them. Post rules on a handout, table tent or flip chart so that they are readily available. If the group meets multiple times, repost rules at each meeting to orient new participants and remind others.
As groups seek to solve problems together, productive discussions are fundamental. Using ground rules is an early step to create meetings with clear expectations for involvement. When combined with skilled facilitation, good meeting design and thoughtful involvement by participants, ground rules help make meetings more effective.
Boyce, K. (2002). Ground rules for public participation. Fact sheet. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Extension
Justice, T., and Jamieson, D. (1998). The complete guide to facilitation. Amherst, MA: HRD Press.
Scheffert, D., Anderson, M., Anderson, S., et al. (2001). Facilitation resources, volume 4: Managing group interaction. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Extension.
Tip sheet prepared by Lisa Hinz, Assistant Extension Professor and Educator, Leadership and Civic Engagement
For more information
Leadership and civic engagement (LCE) educators across the state of Minnesota provide educational programs and consultations that help communities solve problems and make decisions. Contact an educator near you or LCE Program Leader Holli Arp at (507) 372-3900.