University of Minnesota Extension
/
612-624-1222
Menu Menu

Extension > Agriculture > Dairy Extension > Forages > High quality grasses fit well in rations of high producing dairy cows

High quality grasses fit well in rations of high producing dairy cows

Note: The following article was written by Dr. Jerry H. Cherney, Professor, Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences and Debbie J.R. Cherney, Associate Professor, Dept. of Animal Science, both of Cornell University. It is submitted by Dr. Jerry Cherney in advance of the Annual Minnesota Forage Days to be held the week of February 9. Dr. Cherney will be on the program February 10 in Floodwood, February 11 in Detroit Lakes, February 12 in Royalton, and February 13 in Rochester. His presentation is entitled, "Grass and Alfalfa-Grass Management for Dairy Hay and Silage – Seeding to Feeding.

January 17, 2009

Improved management for high quality, advances in equipment, and innovations related to bale silage and other storage options have made grass silage a more attractive option for dairy farmers. Grasses also have significant nutrient management benefits, particularly regarding manure management. While species and variety selection as well as fertilization issues are important, harvest management will determine the success or failure of grass silage as high producing dairy cow forage.

There have been few studies in the USA with cows fed predominantly perennial grass-based TMRs. We have conducted a number of these grass feeding trials with medium to high producing cows. Rather than use forage to concentrate ratios, which favors the higher quality forage, rations were balanced for maximum NDF in the diet that would not limit intake. This allowed most cows to attain their intake potential with optimal ruminal fills. It also maximized the use of homegrown feeds, which had a favorable impact on farm nutrient balance.

Here is a summary of the results from our Cornell dairy feeding trials (all published in research journals):
1.   Variations in fiber digestibility of grasses can account for differences in intake and milk production of cows fed diets similar in chemical composition but varying in ingredient composition.
2.   Grass-based TMRs produced similar quantities of milk as those fed alfalfa-based TMRs.
3.   Dry matter intake increased as the portion of concentrate in diets increased, resulting in higher milk production in high tall fescue diets compared to high alfalfa diets.
4.   Comparing starch vs. sugar supplementation of grass-based diets, the NFC source did not influence intake or milk production, but sucrose feeding lowered N utilization efficiency, when replacing a portion of the high moisture corn in the diet.
5.   Tall fescue and orchardgrass TMRs performed as well as alfalfa, but grass will require more concentrate in the ration than alfalfa.

Grass silage can produce as much milk per cow as alfalfa silage when rations are balanced. We observed no palatability problems with endophyte-free tall fescue. Milk production per cow is a major factor in determining dairy farm sustainability/profitability. The inclusion of non-fibrous carbohydrates (NFC) in the range of 35 to 42% of dietary dry matter is seen as a popular way to increase energy density and thus milk production. Balance of carbohydrates in the diet impacts milk production because it affects amount and ratio of ruminal volatile fatty acids produced, which in turn alters metabolism and partitioning of nutrients.

In the above studies, the higher the fiber in the forage, the more concentrate in the diet. This resulted in generally higher intakes and higher milk production. Higher concentrate feeding results in a shift toward propionic acid production by ruminal microbes. Propionic acid is used by the mammary gland to produce lactose, responsible for milk volume, which accounts for milk production of cows fed grass being as high as those fed a lower fiber alfalfa. Differences in DM intake and subsequent milk production can also be attributed in part to differences in fiber digestibility and indigestible residue, resulting from lignin differences, as well as to differences in NSC.

Using the results from one of the feeding trials above, we can evaluate the impact of corn grain price on the economic return per cow per day for diets varying in forage to concentrate ratio (see Figure). All other costs were kept constant. As might be expected, the higher the forage to concentrate ratio, the lower the impact of increasing corn grain prices.

Grass species and variety evaluation should be focused on maximum yield at optimum silage quality. A harvest date target based on optimum forage NDF for the class of livestock being fed is the goal. A three-cut management is suggested in the northeast, with the first two cuts taken at optimum NDF followed by a fall cut for dry cow forage.

New tall fescue varieties should be seriously considered for dairy systems in the northern USA, particularly those that combine grazing with silage options. New York State is sown in mixture with perennial grasses, such mixtures should lead to a better balance of ration ingredients to maximize total intake. A proper balance of grass and non-fibrous carbohydrates in the diet should increase intake and maximize milk production. In summary, high quality perennial grasses can fit well in the rations of high producing dairy cows.

Figure:  Impact of corn grain price on economic return for diets varying in forage to concentrate ratio.

 

  • © 2013 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
  • The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. Privacy