Home > Family > Parent Education > Positive Parenting Research > Consequences of Physical Punishment on Children
 
  Parent Education  
 

Positive Parenting

Parenting Parenting Research


Consequences of Physical Punishment on Children: A Brief Literature Review

Based on a review of over one hundred studies of physical punishment of children by parents and of several hundred other studies and writings on parental socialization practices, the project team has evolved the following list of consequences of physical punishment on children, arranged here as immediate, short and medium range, and long-range. A few supportive references are cited for each conclusion.

Immediate

  1. Will stop misbehavior, but no more effectively than other firm measures
    (Day & Roberts, 1983; LaVoie, 1974; Straus, 1994)
  2. Can easily escalate to child abuse
    (Kadushin & Martin, 1981; Straus, 1994)

Short and Medium-range

  1. Can not teach what to do--new, appropriate, or alternative behavior
    (Graziano et al, 1996; McCord, 1996)
  2. Does not deter child from repeating same behavior (any better than other tactics)
    (Gallup, 1995; Graziano et al, 1996)
  3. Hinders rather than improves compliance (especially when not in presence of parents)
    (Kuczynski, 1983; Power & Chapieski, 1986; Straus, Sugarman, & Giles-Sims, 1997)
  4. Undermines reasoning, explanation and other forms of "parental induction", because child cannot learn, reason, or problem-solve well while experiencing threat, pain, fear, or anger.
    (Selye, 1976; Straus & Paschall, 1998)
  5. Is inconsistent with non-violent precepts
    (APA, 1995)
  6. Increases probability of aggressive acting out; teaches children that hitting is the way to solve problems
    (Strassberg et al, 1994; Straus, 1994; Straus, Sugarman, & Giles-Sims, 1997; Thompson, 2000)
  7. Chips away at bond of affection between parent and child; induces resentment and fear.
    (McCord, 1996; Rohner, Kean, & Courneyer, 1991; Straus, 1994)

Long-range

  1. Children don’t learn to take responsibility for their own behavior ("external attribution")-- control behavior to avoid being hit (punished) rather than on basis of what is right or wrong.
    (Graziano & Kunce, 1992; Nisan, 1992)
  2. Hinders development of empathy and compassion; child focuses on own pain rather than on effects of behavior on others.
    (Eisenberg & McNally, 1993; Kestenbaum, Farber & Sroufe, 1989; Koestner, Franz, & Weinberger, 1990)
  3. Is a risk factor (increases the probability) for a number of undesirable social and psychological circumstances:
    • Low self-esteem and morale
      (Thompson, 2000; Turner & Finkelhor, 1996; Straus, 1994)
    • Alienation, depression, suicide
      (Straus & Kaufman-Kantor, 1994)
    • Alcohol & drug abuse
      (Straus & Kaufman-Kantor, 1994)
    • Uncontrolled anger, aggression/abusiveness: spouse battering, child abuse
      (Straus & Kaufman-Kantor, 1994)
    • Delinquency, vandalism, and other adolescent problem behavior
      (Cohen & Brooks, 1995; Deater-Deckard & Dodge, 1997; Straus, 1994)
    • Violent crime--assault, murder, rape, robbery
      (McCord, 1988, 1991)
    • Lessened educational, economic and occupational achievement
      (Graziano & Kunce, 1992; Straus & Mathur, 1994, 1995)
  4. Can become an "easy-way out" for youngsters--"easier" than restitution, reconciliation, grounding, penalties
    (Coloroso, 1994)
  5. Becomes impossible as child grows bigger and stronger

Previous | Next

 
 
  Related
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.