Skip to Main navigation Skip to Left navigation Skip to Main content Skip to Footer

University of Minnesota Extension
www.extension.umn.edu
612-624-1222

Extension > Agriculture > Crops > Forage Production > Utilization > Integrating crops and livestock to enhance organic farm resilience

Print Icon Email Icon Share Icon

Integrating crops and livestock to enhance organic farm resilience

Brad Heins, Kathleen Delate, and Hannah Phillips1

Currently, organic production in the U.S. is dominated by cash grain crops, with the majority of organic farmers in the Midwest and Northeast using off-farm purchases to feed their organic animal herds. Integrating crops and livestock on a multi-function operation could have multiple benefits and the potential to improve the profitability of these kinds of operations.

Researchers at Iowa State University, the University of Minnesota, and Rodale Institute are in the second year of a four-year project, funded by the USDA Organic Research and Extension Initiative, to evaluate the production, environmental, and economic benefits of growing cash crops with forage crops for grazing, including small grains and hay crops for livestock feed. They are comparing two crop rotations: 1) Pasture-winter wheat-soybean-pasture and 2) Pasture-winter rye/hairy vetch-corn-pasture and grazing dairy steers on the cover crops as a method of integrating livestock and organic cropping systems.

Pasture and animal productivity

At the University of Minnesota West Central Research and Outreach Center's organic dairy in Morris, Minnesota, the dairy bull calves are: Holsteins; crossbreeds including combinations of Holstein, Montbéliarde, and Swedish Red (HMS); and crossbreeds including combinations of Normande, Jersey, and Swedish Red (NJS).

Study design

Researchers there are grazing steers on a pasture divided in half for the two crop sequences (S1: Pasture-wheat-soybean, and S2: Pasture-rye/vetch-corn). These pastures are separated into 15 paddocks, with a non-grazed enclosure in each paddock.

Winter wheat and winter rye forages were planted on Sept. 11, 2015, for grazing during spring 2016. During this spring, calves were randomly assigned to replicated groups (winter wheat or winter rye), but balanced by breed group to reduce potential breed bias. Twelve-month old dairy steers started grazing the wheat and rye pastures on April 25, 2016. Forage samples were collected when steers moved to new paddocks which was about every three days.

Results

crude-protein

Figure 1. Crude protein percent of winter wheat and winter rye across the grazing season, 2016.

Crude protein (Figure 1) was very high in both the winter wheat and winter rye across the grazing season, which lasted until June 14, 2016 for these grasses. From early May through the end of the grazing season, the crude protein was lower than at the start of grazing; however, the steers were probably more efficient at utilizing the protein when it was lower compared to high protein levels observed during late April.

digestibility

Figure 2. Percent digestibility (NDFd) of winter wheat and winter rye across grazing season, 2016.

Digestibility of the winter wheat and rye also was very high (Figure 2). As the wheat and rye matured, the digestibility was lower; however, the dairy steers grazed each paddock and wheat and rye four times in a two-month period.

Rodale study

At the Rodale Institute in Pennsylvania, dairy steers grazed an eight–acre pasture in 2015, subdivided into four rotationally grazed strips that were each one acre. The steers were allowed to graze each one-acre paddock for about 14 days. Over the 150 grazing days, the steers gained an average of 1.68 lbs/day. There was no difference in the rate of gain on the two pastures.

Grazing enhanced pasture production, as biomass in the enclosures was only 1.85 kg/m2 compared to 12.16 kg/m2 in grazed areas. Rye and wheat were planted in fall 2015 and mob grazed for 14 days in early spring 2016 with plots designed for moving the steers daily. Preliminary data showed higher steer weights after grazing on rye compared to wheat plots. For rye, grazing had a positive effect on plant biomass and grain yield, which averaged 1.2 tons/hectare. By comparison, grazing in wheat plots reduced biomass and grain yield, which averaged 2.6 tons/hectare.

The integration of livestock in organic cropping systems is a prerequisite for long-term agricultural stability. We are studying methods to integrate crops and livestock to determine this model's effect on animal performance, crop productivity (including small grains for grazing), soil quality, food safety and social acceptance. During the third year of the project, organic row crops will be harvested, and crop/livestock budgets will be produced.

1Brad Heins is an associate professor of organic dairy management at the University of Minnesota’s West Central Research Center in Morris, Minn. Kathleen Delate is a professor of organic agriculture at Iowa State University, and directs the Organic Agriculture Program there. Hannah Phillips is a graduate student in animal science at the University of Minnesota.

  • © Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
  • The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. Privacy